Live data from Hacker News

Facebook Whistleblower Leaks Thousands of Pages of Incriminating Internal Docs

npr.org

21–30 of 734 posts

Re: Facebook Whistleblower Leaks Thousands of Pages of Incriminating Internal Docs

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That was a quote from Facebook’s official response to the leaks. The display ad on mobile cuts the article in a really odd way.

> The display ad on mobile cuts the article in a really odd way. Yep. That got me. Thanks for pointing it out. I removed that part of my post.

You should put an edit line in your OP then. Currently thread doesn’t really make sense with those silent edits.

Re: Facebook Whistleblower Leaks Thousands of Pages of Incriminating Internal Docs

#22

What are the potential legal ramifications for the whistleblower?

That’s a good question. Leaking internal company documents doesn’t automatically grant someone whistleblower protection. She appears to be trying an angle where she claims that Facebook’s activities have harmed shareholders in an attempt to capture some degree of whistleblower protection, but that’s a huge stretch given that she’s arguing they made choices in the interest of profits without violating any actual laws.

At this point, I think her best chance is to hope that Facebook will simply try to minimize the legal issue to avoid making her into too much of a martyr.

Re: Facebook Whistleblower Leaks Thousands of Pages of Incriminating Internal Docs

#23

What are the potential legal ramifications for the whistleblower?

Seeing as how the actual mechanics of the leak were orchestrated by an attorney, and the documents were sent to an enforcement division of the Federal Government, it would be a pretty fair guess that they have considered it and are on solid legal ground.

Re: Facebook Whistleblower Leaks Thousands of Pages of Incriminating Internal Docs

#24
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From HN guidelines: > Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article?"

Because at the time it was the top comment making speculative claims and taking quotes WILDLY out of context. Accusing the author of trumping up an issue when the OP is quoting the rebuttal from the company is not just misleading but harmful misinformation and should be rightfully called out

[deleted]

Re: Facebook Whistleblower Leaks Thousands of Pages of Incriminating Internal Docs

#25

EDIT: I removed a misquote from this comment after another user pointed out my mistake. There do appear to be a few legitimate concerns worth investigating, but it’s starting to feel like the media has sensed that Facebook is the villain du jour and they’re throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks. These stories seem to dance around the subject of what exactly Facebook did, but instead focus on the existenc…

I have to say it's extremely bad form to retroactively completely reedit your post so that your original statements (which were shown to be wrong) don't show anymore.

I removed the misquote and thanked another user for pointing it out, but the rest of the comment still stands. Deleting a comment isn’t an option after people reply, so I don’t know what you want me to do. I apologized, removed the mistake, and thanked someone for pointing it out.

Re: Facebook Whistleblower Leaks Thousands of Pages of Incriminating Internal Docs

#27

What are the potential legal ramifications for the whistleblower?

Potentially severe for leaking company IP. There are explicit legal protections for whistleblowing to the SEC but I don't believe there is anything protecting one's right to go to journalists with privileged information. However, Facebook would be 100% insane to press legal charges because that just drags this on even longer and reinforce the perception that they're bullies

Re: Facebook Whistleblower Leaks Thousands of Pages of Incriminating Internal Docs

#28

EDIT: I removed a misquote from this comment after another user pointed out my mistake. There do appear to be a few legitimate concerns worth investigating, but it’s starting to feel like the media has sensed that Facebook is the villain du jour and they’re throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks. These stories seem to dance around the subject of what exactly Facebook did, but instead focus on the existenc…

[deleted]

Re: Facebook Whistleblower Leaks Thousands of Pages of Incriminating Internal Docs

#29
What concrete information has been revealed that implicates Facebook in illegal behavior?

How does the "whistleblower"'s stated desires wrt goverment-mandated moderation standards differ from those articulated by representatives of the company itself? Such a framework would shift liability away from the company, possibly reduce their moderation load, and create a significant barrier for entry for potential competitors.

Post reply on HN