And even the content is not much better.
Hermit Programmers Are Dead
71–80 of 133 posts
Re: Hermit Programmers Are Dead
#72In summary, hermit programmers who only write code for themselves are dead because: As they don’t plan, you never know when (or if) they are going to finish a task. As they don’t document, their code is not reusable because nobody knows how it works. As they don’t test, chances are the code they write is full of bugs. As they don’t refactor, the software cannot evolve. As they don’t handle infrastructure, their code…
> The genius behind Google’s browser
https://www.ft.com/content/03775904-177c-11de-8c9d-0000779fd...
He was heavily characterized as a hermit at the time at least (maybe now we'd just say remote worker).
Re: Hermit Programmers Are Dead
#73Don't be good at programming, just glue lego bricks together, This Is The Future!
Re: Hermit Programmers Are Dead
#74> As they don’t plan, you never know when (or if) they are going to finish a task.
> As they don’t document, their code is not reusable because nobody knows how it works.
> As they don’t test, chances are the code they write is full of bugs.
> As they don’t refactor, the software cannot evolve.
> As they don’t handle infrastructure, their code has only been executed on their machine, and only God knows what will happen when the code runs in production.
> As they don’t have good communication skills, they do not know how to sell what they do to the market, which is why they are always behind the competence.
> As they don’t diversify their skills, powerful AI will take over their workplaces.
I have only one answer to these rather ... interesting ... statements: https://stackoverflow.com/story/chrismarshall
Re: Hermit Programmers Are Dead
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Indeed, the whole article is worthless and designed to elevate its author who presumably has all of these "communication skills" and a reasonably good looking picture. He might even get hired because managers love this kind of incoherent drivel. He is still wrong though.
corroborated by his tagline: "I'm a Ph.D. student doing excellent research in Software Technology"
Re: Hermit Programmers Are Dead
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe "Bad Programmer" is more apt Some of the very best programmers I've ever met tick all those boxes. They could deliver in a week something other teams would struggle with for months. The problem of course came when other people would try to understand and build on what they had done. If you believe the quote that "Real Developers ship" then they where absolutely Real Developers.
I suppose it depends how we define "good" and "bad". To me "good" means "produce working code that can be easily picked up by others". Because of that I suppose I don't fall into this mythical group of programmers that can crank out something in a week that teams struggle with for months. I've done it several times but it's not how I usually roll, plus teams can be super slow sometimes so single guy beating them isn'…
Re: Hermit Programmers Are Dead
#77Huh. The author would probably consider me a "hermit programmer." > As they don’t plan, you never know when (or if) they are going to finish a task. > As they don’t document, their code is not reusable because nobody knows how it works. > As they don’t test, chances are the code they write is full of bugs. > As they don’t refactor, the software cannot evolve. > As they don’t handle infrastructure, their code has only…
Re: Hermit Programmers Are Dead
#78If you are going to write a text pontificating how good programmers should work, at least have the decency of placing a decent toolbar at the top (broken in Safari). And even the content is not much better.
That being said, the article sucks and I hate his fonts.
Re: Hermit Programmers Are Dead
#79Re: Hermit Programmers Are Dead
#80And communication skills where highly useful in the mid 90s as much as they will always be. And the salaries for developers are so much higher now than before. Yeah sure everyone that knew what CGI was in 1996 got a great job, but that salary was like 25% of what is now.