How much information can a small image contain?
21–30 of 30 posts
Re: How much information can a small image contain?
#22...except that we also do it by math. It is just so fast and optimized, that we refer to it as instinct.
Re: How much information can a small image contain?
#23Many moons ago, I wondered what it would look like if you iteratively generated every possible image. It doesn't sound very useful at all (and it certainly isn't) but I learned C++ and SDL that way. This is probably terrible code by anybody's standards but maybe someone wants to take a look: https://github.com/svenstaro/infinerator
A story about the text version of this concept: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Library_of_Babel
Re: How much information can a small image contain?
#24Would this be a good way to avoid censorship. Encode an image by mixing it with a private key image, maybe xor the cells or something like that. Post online. Anyone with the key image can decode.
Re: How much information can a small image contain?
#25> "Machine learning tries to do by math what we are able to do by instinct" ...except that we also do it by math. It is just so fast and optimized, that we refer to it as instinct.
Re: How much information can a small image contain?
#26The introduction has lost me completely: such a long winded way to say that 32x32x3 bytes can represent 2^(32x32x3x8) different values.
I think the point of the article is that there isn't 2^(32x32x3x8) meaningful images that can be encoded - there's far less than that because so many of the possible arrangements of the data are just meaningless noise, or millions of versions of the same thing with slightly altered color values etc. The article is saying that neural networks are cool, because part of what they do is finding which images actually cont…
Re: How much information can a small image contain?
#27Re: How much information can a small image contain?
#28First, article tried to assess information capacity in Shannon style, completely disregarding what signal is (a) two-dimensional and (b) highly redundant, that is, ignoring the traits of being an image.
Second, article taken too much liberties while mixing photorealistic and pixel-art images. The latter is really an art, since there is no formally defined ("machine") transform between these two types. And last but not least these types have significantly different information density profiles.
No DSP curiosity here.
Re: How much information can a small image contain?
#29Re: How much information can a small image contain?
#30Many moons ago, I wondered what it would look like if you iteratively generated every possible image. It doesn't sound very useful at all (and it certainly isn't) but I learned C++ and SDL that way. This is probably terrible code by anybody's standards but maybe someone wants to take a look: https://github.com/svenstaro/infinerator
A story about the text version of this concept: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Library_of_Babel