Live data from Hacker News

‎Amplosion: Redirect AMP Links on the App Store

apps.apple.com

151–156 of 156 posts

Re: ‎Amplosion: Redirect AMP Links on the App Store

#151
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s not open source, it lacks a license entirely. And, therefore, nobody is allowed to build it themselves.

You can sure build it, if you want to. And the source is open, so you can check it out. But sure, I’ll cave. What would be a better term for this?

Source available?

Re: ‎Amplosion: Redirect AMP Links on the App Store

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

... and in typical Apple fashion, it costs money to get it.

Yes, damn developers wanting money for their work!

No, it's not about that, and shame on you for thinking so.

It's the plain fact that if this were a problem on Windows or linux, a free script would be available, but because it's Apple, it's a paid plugin or add-on, as it is with everything you need to customise an apple device.

It's a matter of developer culture, where you develop things for a fun, and to solve a problem. Not to make a quick buck.

Re: ‎Amplosion: Redirect AMP Links on the App Store

#153
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s not open source, it lacks a license entirely. And, therefore, nobody is allowed to build it themselves.

You can sure build it, if you want to. And the source is open, so you can check it out. But sure, I’ll cave. What would be a better term for this?

> You can sure build it, if you want to.

I am physically able, yes, but I am not legally allowed to. Since I am not given any permission (i.e. license) to do that.

> And the source is open, so you can check it out.

The term “open source” is used in two ways: the intelligence community reportedly uses it to refer to information sources which are publicly available, as opposed to secretly gathered information. The other use of the term “open source” is as defined by the OSI, who pioneered this new use.

The usual term for source code which is merely available for reading, and not much, if anything, else, is “source-available”¹.

1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-available_software

Re: ‎Amplosion: Redirect AMP Links on the App Store

#154
post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can sure build it, if you want to. And the source is open, so you can check it out. But sure, I’ll cave. What would be a better term for this?

> You can sure build it, if you want to. I am physically able, yes, but I am not legally allowed to. Since I am not given any permission (i.e. license ) to do that. > And the source is open, so you can check it out. The term “open source” is used in two ways: the intelligence community reportedly uses it to refer to information sources which are publicly available, as opposed to secretly gathered information. The oth…

> I am physically able, yes

We agree, then :) If they’re anxious regarding the privacy implications of using this extension, they can build it themselves.

> The term …

Alright, I agree, that was a misuse of the definition on my part, and I should have said “Source-available”. I was unaware of this definition, so thanks!

Re: ‎Amplosion: Redirect AMP Links on the App Store

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can sure build it, if you want to. And the source is open, so you can check it out. But sure, I’ll cave. What would be a better term for this?

Source available?

Nice, thanks! Didn’t know that one.

Re: ‎Amplosion: Redirect AMP Links on the App Store

#156
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed. But in those cases where I don't like DDG results, I like how I can add "!g" to the end of my search and it redirects the search to Google.

Doing this on mobile is really not fun, I wish it was a simple click in their results UI

You can do "g!" instead of "!g" on mobile. (And even hn! works, but not every other one.) This helped me considerably
Post reply on HN