Live data from Hacker News

Dropbox Capture

dropbox.com

71–74 of 74 posts

Re: Dropbox Capture

#71
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Screenshot/recording --> clipboard --> Dropbox capture + permissions/billing --> Slack Could you list some examples of software that require you to go through permissions or billing for every usage? Otherwise, this is a made-up concern.

GDocs, for one. Every time you share a link, some people can see it and some can't, and newcomers and agencies keep having to ask for permissions... Sure, it's fixable, but again why introduce the complexity when Slack and Jira ALREADY LET YOU PASTE IN RICH MEDIA and handle permissions and sharing internally? What does Dropbox Capture add that makes it worth the extra hoops? The markup? The embedded avatar? I just fa…

> GDocs, for one. Every time you share a link

I’ve never heard anyone complain about granular permissions for potentially sensitive documents. However, your “issue” is entirely made-up, because you can easily generate an “Everyone” link in gDocs.

> Slack and Jira ALREADY LET YOU PASTE IN RICH MEDIA and handle permissions and sharing internally

Slack & Jira are for different use cases/audiences, and handle significantly less rich media than gDocs can. However, if your company is shoehorning gDocs into situations where you could type into these other tools, that’s a social problem, not a technical one.

> What does Dropbox Capture add that makes it worth the extra hoops?

Given their positioning and competition, I’m going to assume there are very few “hoops” in their UX.

> I just fail to see the worth of this product...

Honestly, from reading the rest of your rant and misplaced anger, I don’t think you’d be able to clearly see product value anyways.

Re: Dropbox Capture

#72
post #67
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For me, it’s in plaintext, at the top of the page, for both mobile and desktop - not in an auto playing video. I get that hating on Dropbox’ diversification is a HN pastime, but please be rational and not emotional.

No, thanks. I'm okay having a healthy balance of clear thought and normal human emotion. This has nothing to do with either. Why did you mention that? Quit derailing. The video is right next to the text. Now that I know there's text there, I could ad block the nuisance, but I'm not interested in the tool. Or continuing this conversation. Go have your unmanaged, unrecognized, denied emotions somewhere else.

> but I'm not interested in the tool

What are you doing in this post? HN guidelines are clear about fostering open, quality discussion. This is not a thread to rant about Dropbox just because you hate it.

Re: Dropbox Capture

#73
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GDocs, for one. Every time you share a link, some people can see it and some can't, and newcomers and agencies keep having to ask for permissions... Sure, it's fixable, but again why introduce the complexity when Slack and Jira ALREADY LET YOU PASTE IN RICH MEDIA and handle permissions and sharing internally? What does Dropbox Capture add that makes it worth the extra hoops? The markup? The embedded avatar? I just fa…

> GDocs, for one. Every time you share a link I’ve never heard anyone complain about granular permissions for potentially sensitive documents. However, your “issue” is entirely made-up, because you can easily generate an “Everyone” link in gDocs. > Slack and Jira ALREADY LET YOU PASTE IN RICH MEDIA and handle permissions and sharing internally Slack & Jira are for different use cases/audiences, and handle significant…

Also, it is very valuable to persist all these videos/screenshots in the cloud. You can re-use them later and maybe it will help you debug. It is neat to auto-organize these files.

Re: Dropbox Capture

#74
post #72
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, thanks. I'm okay having a healthy balance of clear thought and normal human emotion. This has nothing to do with either. Why did you mention that? Quit derailing. The video is right next to the text. Now that I know there's text there, I could ad block the nuisance, but I'm not interested in the tool. Or continuing this conversation. Go have your unmanaged, unrecognized, denied emotions somewhere else.

> but I'm not interested in the tool What are you doing in this post? HN guidelines are clear about fostering open, quality discussion. This is not a thread to rant about Dropbox just because you hate it.

I didn't rant about Dropbox.
Post reply on HN