Live data from Hacker News

Vintage Byte Magazine Library

vintageapple.org

31–40 of 96 posts

Re: Vintage Byte Magazine Library

#32

People complain about ads , but browse any volume and count the number of ads (may be easier to count the number of non-ads). And you had to pay for that stuff.

Remember, paying for that stuff had value in those times. People would buy directories and or pay for advice / direction from others in the know too.

Was hard to understand all that was going on out there. The ADS made more sense in that way than they do now. Sometimes, when a specific product was needed, those ADS connected people up in a way everyone found to have value.

One thing, perhaps missed today given content marketing, was following the ADS to see who did what. New products, old ones phasing out, where things were, who, and sometimes pretty good reasons why all were found in those ADS. Scanning them was not all fluff. (not always fluff I should say, because yeah. There was fluff)

Re: Vintage Byte Magazine Library

#33
post #29

Looking at some of these, it's kind of sad how it went from a deeply technical magazine (the earliest publication had an ad to join ACM, and it has several circuit diagrams) to a pop-tech supermarket mag (with tons of ads, lots of high-level hit pieces (how to get ready for y2k, for example), and A BAJILLIONTY ADS. I'm glad that they kept some semblance of technical content towards the end.

It is sad. Tech pubs ended up on one hell of a grind to stay in the game. I am glad for what we did get though. The golden era was a tech goldmine!

Re: Vintage Byte Magazine Library

#35
post #29

Looking at some of these, it's kind of sad how it went from a deeply technical magazine (the earliest publication had an ad to join ACM, and it has several circuit diagrams) to a pop-tech supermarket mag (with tons of ads, lots of high-level hit pieces (how to get ready for y2k, for example), and A BAJILLIONTY ADS. I'm glad that they kept some semblance of technical content towards the end.

Many initially interesting publications have suffered the same fate. As a more recent example, Ars Technica is getting there.

Re: Vintage Byte Magazine Library

#36

Looking at one of these now I remember how magazines made technology very exciting (I don't think it was just because I was younger). I think a lot of it was down to the visuals. You just won't get illustrations like that on someone's blog. The illustrations made the technology seem more real and certainly more glamorous.

I don't think it was just because we were younger. I also don't think it was just because of the visuals (though those helped). I think a lot of it was because things were moving so fast. The 386 was an astonishing improvement over the 286. But now, the next generation Intel chip is... kind of nice, I guess? But it's not all that exciting. Windows 95 was a massive improvement over Windows 3.0. Windows 11 doesn't make…

It was screaming fast!

We went from a discussion on how many colors a machine had, whether it flogged a speaker for sound, or had an actual sound system, to multi-media excellence, and it happened QUICK!

I sure enjoyed my trip through those times.

But, there may be more to come!

Custom silicon is on it's way back around the computing circle of life. The way I see it, the different options we've seen hold fairly stable for a decade or so have all converged on similar ground. Differentiation is sometimes more contrived than actual, like the software, or form factor of a device, maybe it's ports, mean more than the actual computing potential it has. Additionally, we've somewhat peaked in terms of sequential compute, and things like multi-media are fairly ordinary, and of sufficient quality many don't see a big distinction between pro efforts and gear and consumer grade gear. Or, it just flat doesn't matter.

And now the dam is breaking!

To gain advantage, and also lock customers in, leverage mindshare and data, other investments users have or are making, custom silicon is looking very appealing now.

On top of that, the bigger players have the resources to do the development, more of what people need to know about doing it is out there, and tools are more available now to the point where mere mortals can play in this game.

A quick look at something relevant?

Consider the Parallax Propeller 2 microcontroller chip. It's done on an older process, 130nm I believe. On that process, the creator and team managed to get an 8 core, 300Mhz plus design with a lot of features. That project took a decade or so, and north of a million. While high, that's not out of line compared to what it all was just a short time before.

Chips are done, available for people to buy and build into projects / products. It's a custom design with particular emphasis on real time, parallel or concurrent programming, and data streaming, measurement with all I/O pins capable of analog or digital operation. For some applications nothing will come close. A great example of what can be done now.

The bigger players have all done, or are working on custom silicon for one reason or another. AI, network, computation, etc...

Soon, we are going to head back to something closer to that era. More highly differentiated devices / machines. Maybe there is room for the kind of work BYTE did in some form...

But, whether that happens or not, we may well see custom silicon push things forward again in dramatic ways.

Re: Vintage Byte Magazine Library

#37

Aw, I have a copy of the 1988 Byte issue on Lisp that I ought to scan and contribute, though probably to the Internet Archive, as I'm not sure how to send it in here.

One of their last really good issues, including a version of this condensed intro to SICP: https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/6064/AIM-986.... (if that's the issue I'm thinking of).

I had stopped subscribing by then because it was getting more "consumery".

Re: Vintage Byte Magazine Library

#38
post #21
post #14

I would love to see a reboot of Byte Magazine even if it only came back in digital form.

A digital-only publication cannot survive without playing the same content strategy games as all the other publications out there. A new BYTE would quickly start diluting its value by offering a podcast, YT channel, IG/Snap Stories, affiliate links and a website slathered with Adsense ads. You'll wonder why they bothered rebooting it in the first place.

Or... It's subscription only, and maybe those other things don't matter so much.

Re: Vintage Byte Magazine Library

#39
One of my fondest memories of BYTE is why I have the career I have today.

It was a how-to discussing making your system more secure against a virus (boot-sector/TSR).

It explained how to edit your io.sys, and command.com; so that the system would use different files then: config.sys & autoexec.bat to boot.

I failed at this task, and learned a very hard lesson about backups, but it wasn't as painful as it could have been. Format & re-install was rather common back then too (1-3'ish months on average)

But I learned that I WANT to hack on my systems. I learned that I COULD run MY hardware how I wanted. It opened the world to me.

I do not accept a system as it's presented to me, I must find the edge-case and break-out of the conforms that would keep me contained.

I also learned about the difference between obscurity and security too. And that combined they are greater then the sum of their parts.

Re: Vintage Byte Magazine Library

#40
This is well timed. I was actually going over the Internet Archive's collection just the other day. It's a bit sad to watch the decline in quality as you move through the volumes. Somewhere around 1985 - 1986 BYTE shifted towards becoming just another magazine hocking hardware/software. It got so bad that some issues started to look like a rip-off of Ziff-Davis's PC Magazine. Around that point I'm betting a lot of BYTE readers left for greener pastures at Circuit Cellar Ink and Dr. Dobb's.
Post reply on HN