Live data from Hacker News

IMGZ – Paid image sharing

imgz.org

321–330 of 409 posts

Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing

#321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hahah, that's a great idea! Maybe I should start auctioning off sealed accounts, and you see what photos are in there when you buy it.

Love it! Maybe show a small percentage of the photos picked at random in the sealed account to bidders...

YES! Excellent.

Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing

#322
post #164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I found and posted the email thread where he admitted to not having a paid account. He also managed to get into his account fine (that's how he saw that the data wasn't there), so the stuff about the username isn't accurate either. I can look at payment records, but I've literally never had a single complaint of paid users' data being deleted by accident. I don't think he wants to hurt me (who cares about me or my se…

Publicly accusing you of fraud is at the very least malicious disregard for the truth if it's a false accusation. This is supposed to be Hacker News, not Character Assassination News. (That's Twitter.)

[deleted]

Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing

#323
post #288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it not ok to make a "little bit" (you can be wealthy beyond your wildest dreams from a small business) of money from a opinionated business (akin to a restauraunt, perhaps) rather than conform and become just one more ycombinator-esque startup in the hope you'll make even more money if you make it big.

Or zero money, even!

But definitely not lose money, that would be a blasphemy!

Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing

#324

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hahah, that's a great idea! Maybe I should start auctioning off sealed accounts, and you see what photos are in there when you buy it.

Love it! Maybe show a small percentage of the photos picked at random in the sealed account to bidders...

You could also convert them to a lower resolution, just to keep the suspense alive.

Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing

#325

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly I feel like you're being very dishonest about your commitment to providing no support, you've provided all kinds of support already.

Ah but I didn't commit to providing no support, I didn't commit to provide support. Support is provided at-will!

Ahhh how there's nothing sacred in the world no more! One can't even trust people to provide no support! Those Internat services will doom us!

Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing

#326
post #279

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I'm still a sarcastic asshole. Beats being a boring asshole like me! :P (And thank you for the kind plug)

I purchased one based on this exchange alone. I'm an impressionable sod!

I think AussieWog just made more of this post than stavros did.

Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing

#327

I got so much joy out of the FAQ I nearly paid just as a thank you for putting a smile on my face.

> I got so much joy out of the FAQ I nearly paid just as a thank you for putting a smile on my face. > I got so much joy out of the FAQ I nearly paid > I nearly paid > nearly paid > nearly

Sorry, service provider satisfaction not guaranteed! Also, the customer may have had a great journey with the website.

Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing

#329
post #325

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah but I didn't commit to providing no support, I didn't commit to provide support. Support is provided at-will!

Ahhh how there's nothing sacred in the world no more! One can't even trust people to provide no support! Those Internat services will doom us!

It's cats and dogs living together!
Post reply on HN