Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure there's any definite way to erode trust these days, since the most polished and believable sites can (and often do) completely betray the trust they instill or profess to uphold. Perhaps the creator is truly tired of the BS and guesses that there's an audience who also is. And for $5/yr, it costs virtually nothing to try. The bigger question is about limits of what can be posted, policing of content, and…
The fact that it's so cheap makes it feel even sketchier, like who am I giving my credit card to if they are making it that cheap and easy to do; is it a trick to get my CC? They don't care how little I give, because the $5 isn't their target, it's something else. As a developer I know you can build stuff that actually is that cheap, but still, makes some alarm bell go off. Maybe if the site was worded differently, i…
IMGZ – Paid image sharing
171–180 of 409 posts
Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure there's any definite way to erode trust these days, since the most polished and believable sites can (and often do) completely betray the trust they instill or profess to uphold. Perhaps the creator is truly tired of the BS and guesses that there's an audience who also is. And for $5/yr, it costs virtually nothing to try. The bigger question is about limits of what can be posted, policing of content, and…
The fact that it's so cheap makes it feel even sketchier, like who am I giving my credit card to if they are making it that cheap and easy to do; is it a trick to get my CC? They don't care how little I give, because the $5 isn't their target, it's something else. As a developer I know you can build stuff that actually is that cheap, but still, makes some alarm bell go off. Maybe if the site was worded differently, i…
Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing
#173Spoiler alert: Image hosting is a little bit more complicated. Good luck with it.
Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing
#174> It's simple, what do you want
No bullshit, you say?
I like tongue in cheek stuff, jokes and all, but that tone sounds more like “fuck you” than a solid, reliable business relationship with adequate respect where the customer is not the product.
Besides that: Props for so quickly capitalizing on the (probably still brewing) imgur controversy!
Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
You know what, I literally couldn't give a fuck. I have multiple hosted web storage, google storage, paid-for dropbox etc accounts, as well as reddit and imgur accounts - and the one I use to share stupid images is this one. This was posted here a couple of years back, I liked the pitch, i paid for it. I also enjoy avocado liberally smashed on shit.
> I also enjoy avocado liberally smashed on shit. good luck buying a house being so financially irresponsible
Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is like $12 a year. I also have a dropbox account, which I hate. I also have various web storage accounts. For sharing silly daft images that have little connection to me, I use my imgz.org account all the time.
$12/year for 2GB. Free plans: Dropbox 2GB, OneDrive 5GB, Box 10GB, GDrive 15GB. They all let you generate public read-only links which aren't connected back to your account.
Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing
#177If imgz becomes the next FAANG, then that'd be quite cheap.
Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing
#178is your service profitable? what tier of service does average user go for?
Two out of three users use the "cheapass" plan. The other guy has the "person" plan.
Re: IMGZ – Paid image sharing
#179I see a lot of comments about the $5 a year quote. I see $12 on front page - I wonder if it's just changed in last hour or am I getting a Canadian special :-)
(It changed in the last hour https://gitlab.com/stavros/imgz/-/commit/7bdac35c8bc397bf829... )
Flawless demand adjustment, though.