On the surface looks like an improvement over htop ( which I've been using for 10+ years ) But this is the kind of software that I would want to keep using. Will btop keep being supported? Is btop going to be available in practically all distros I use? Even currently on Arch its only in the AUR. Its also concerning there is btop[0] and bpytop[1]? I don't understand the difference. [0] https://github.com/aristocratos/…
I think bpytop is the previous version writtten in Python. btop++ is a cpp re-write
Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
61–66 of 66 posts
Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#62Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#63I have been using glances for a terminal sysmon but I don't like that it eats so much RAM. Can someone please recommend a system monitor that is easy to comprehend and less resource hungry? I am also curious about below [0] since it came up recently. [0] https://github.com/facebookincubator/below
Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't control your device OS or otherwise have access to a machine you do, your OS does not offer modern packages, and you don't have the ability to otherwise pull in development toolchain resources.... yet it's supposed to be the projects problem you can't compile something started in 2021 from source on your older setup? I get your current situation is less than ideal for you but at some point you have to accep…
You have the implicit assumption that I'm working on an individual project. Imagine a large company which settles on an OS for some product that goes into the field for 10 or 20 years. That's the OS you're stuck with. And yes, that's painful in itself. Now, I _can_, with some effort, pull/build a development toolchain. But it would be much nicer if I could have access to this utility on machines with older toolchains…
There is no such implication.
Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
You have the implicit assumption that I'm working on an individual project. Imagine a large company which settles on an OS for some product that goes into the field for 10 or 20 years. That's the OS you're stuck with. And yes, that's painful in itself. Now, I _can_, with some effort, pull/build a development toolchain. But it would be much nicer if I could have access to this utility on machines with older toolchains…
You can install the binary on your device and don't need to compile from source for using the application. It seems unfair to both developers and other users of the project to expect it to be compatible with older toolchains given the benefits of the newer builds.
From linux from scratch to muslcc to buildroot to yocto you can get nice new compilers and run them in docker or in a simple chroot. Requiring new compiler versions is a good thing and any disto related impediments are a distraction from just getting simple toolchain tooling going.
Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use `unp` for the same thing. `-u` extracts into a directory.
Since unp is a stock ticker, it's a little harder to find: https://github.com/mitsuhiko/unp Looks like it might be in standard Ubuntu repositories: https://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/man1/unp.1.html
https://theunarchiver.com/command-line https://github.com/MacPaw/XADMaster
in difference to unp and atool, unar does not depend on other tools to unpack the actual archive