Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
41–50 of 66 posts
Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://linux.die.net/man/1/multitail I never heard of this one before. What's the benefit instead of doing this with Tmux?
Biggest thing is if you’re doing a streaming tail with an * pattern, it figures it out and filters them into proper groups instead of a single blob stream. I didn’t know you could something like that we tmux though. I’ll have to check it out. :)
Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#43Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#44Wow, this is a very nice fully featured, with mouse support, terminal application! Just installed from the AUR and hopefully will remember it to replace htop in my mind!
Create an htop alias for btop. Then you'll never have to worry about forgetting it.
Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can just use a GCC docker image to build: https://hub.docker.com/_/gcc
No I can't... without an appropriate installation of docker and/or dependencies of docker. See: https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/rootless/#prerequisi...
Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#46Quick word of warning, if you download it: The release archive doesn't create a directory, just untars into $CWD. So do this: mkdir btop cd btop tar xjvf ~/Downloads/btop.....tbz ./install.sh Apart from that, it looks really, really nice. I like it a lot!
This is why I have trust issues when github pulling or exploding a tar.
Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#47On the surface looks like an improvement over htop ( which I've been using for 10+ years ) But this is the kind of software that I would want to keep using. Will btop keep being supported? Is btop going to be available in practically all distros I use? Even currently on Arch its only in the AUR. Its also concerning there is btop[0] and bpytop[1]? I don't understand the difference. [0] https://github.com/aristocratos/…
Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#48For me it’s enough iotop + bpytop + htop
Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#49On the surface looks like an improvement over htop ( which I've been using for 10+ years ) But this is the kind of software that I would want to keep using. Will btop keep being supported? Is btop going to be available in practically all distros I use? Even currently on Arch its only in the AUR. Its also concerning there is btop[0] and bpytop[1]? I don't understand the difference. [0] https://github.com/aristocratos/…
Would you like to have btop in Arch [community]? I could move it if it has enough interest.
Re: Btop++ is a power resource monitor for Linux
#50For me it’s enough iotop + bpytop + htop