Disappearing Bicyclist – Sam Loyd (1906)
geogebra.org
Disappearing Bicyclist – Sam Loyd (1906)
1–10 of 66 posts
Re: Disappearing Bicyclist – Sam Loyd (1906)
#2(Hint: look at the heads)
Re: Disappearing Bicyclist – Sam Loyd (1906)
#3Re: Disappearing Bicyclist – Sam Loyd (1906)
#4There's a good Numberphile video explaining this illusion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE44nr4d3iY (Hint: look at the heads)
Re: Disappearing Bicyclist – Sam Loyd (1906)
#5Rotate it to the A configuration: There are still 24 halves, bundled in pairs. But now we count it as 13 boys instead of 12. Why? Because in the bottom left, two of the halves that got paired together are both flag-and-head halves, so even though that was just two halves in our original count, it feels like the two of them bundled together should count as two boys instead of just one now.
(Correspondingly, in the top right, two of the halves that get bundled together in the A configuration are both non-flag halves. But the result still seems sufficient to call one full boy instead of zero boys.)
Re: Disappearing Bicyclist – Sam Loyd (1906)
#6Unfortunately this doesn't work with banknotes ... unless you can find lots of people who are willing to accept a banknote that appears to have been torn into two pieces and then stuck together again with sticky tape, with the line of the tear being a weird curve that just happens to cross both serial numbers in roughly the same place.
http://mathandmultimedia.com/2014/07/22/explanation-infinite...
Re: Disappearing Bicyclist – Sam Loyd (1906)
#7Re: Disappearing Bicyclist – Sam Loyd (1906)
#8Re: Disappearing Bicyclist – Sam Loyd (1906)
#9Can only count 13 boys whether from point A or B..what am I missing?
Took me a second too.
Re: Disappearing Bicyclist – Sam Loyd (1906)
#10Unfortunately this doesn't work with banknotes ... unless you can find lots of people who are willing to accept a banknote that appears to have been torn into two pieces and then stuck together again with sticky tape, with the line of the tear being a weird curve that just happens to cross both serial numbers in roughly the same place.
Examples: https://books.google.com/books?id=e7QzAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA318&lpg=... (1804)
https://books.google.com/books?id=osjhDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA114&lpg=... (1850s)
A more tricky recent variant replaces the cut-out part with a fake part: https://bc.ctvnews.ca/can-you-spot-the-fake-splice-and-tape-... (why do these criminals take the effort and risk of creating a fake fiver? I would discard the remains of the fiver, and spend all effort on improving the technique for transplanting the hologram to the fake 100)
Of course, this works better with small denominations, if only because people expect larger denominations to look newer.
The risk of getting caught also is fairly large, I think, but a good criminal can feign innocence, claiming to have gotten the note elsewhere.