Earlier quoted context omitted.
It also probably has to do with personalities, and who did what. NeXT was the Jobs thing. So Jobs came back, and they based things on NeXT.
While killing almost everything else. The video of the audience heat he is taking for those decisions and how he goes justifying his decisions is worth watching for anyone that needs to go through something similar.
So what is the deal with A/UX anyways?
161–166 of 166 posts
Re: So what is the deal with A/UX anyways?
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
* On the software side, Big Mac's vision of Unix with Macintosh on top is familiar from NeXT and OS X. It was also roughly paralleled by many other projects, from Pink/Taligent and BeOS to OS/2 and WinNT. But it's worth asking where Jobs and the other Big Mac supporters got the idea from in turn. One obvious source of inspiration for the NeXT work was Xerox PARC, and Jobs seems to have been acknowledging (or claiming…
* "Milwaukee" wasn't Big Mac, even though (if Levy is correct) it was also sometimes referred to as "Little Big Mac". As Aventure-Apple states (and Levy confirms), it was a rival (or at least completely indepdendent) effort. Insanely Great says that it was a grassroots initiative by engineer Mike Dhuey focussed on creating a version-2 Macintosh with internal expansion slots. (And it wasn't even the only other project…
Re: So what is the deal with A/UX anyways?
#163A/UX only supported m68k macs, right? I wonder if you could patch the m68k emulator in the later nanokernel for PowerPC Macs to support it. Would it be legal? Gods no. Would it be a throwback to the kind of really dirty hacks I associate with the 90s? Absolutely. It looks like a decent amount of work reversing the Powermac nanokernel has been done: https://github.com/elliotnunn/NanoKernel
newer Qemu can emulate the 68040, and even a Quadra 800. that would be the much easier route...
Re: So what is the deal with A/UX anyways?
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
While killing almost everything else. The video of the audience heat he is taking for those decisions and how he goes justifying his decisions is worth watching for anyone that needs to go through something similar.
Do you have a link to that video?
Re: So what is the deal with A/UX anyways?
#165After doing A/UX work I mentioned elsewhere in this thread, I interviewed at Apple. They offered me a 5% pay cut for the chance to commute from Berkeley to Cupertino, which wasn't great but at least the stock was likely to be worthwhile. (UniSoft had a great team, but no business model). After I got the Apple offer, I met with people up the management chain to the VP a step above the entire A/UX org (3 people up from…
What year was the Apple interview?
Re: So what is the deal with A/UX anyways?
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apollo was building bit-slice 68000 emulations (to have an MMU) into the mid '80s, and ran Aegis, their homegrown fully-networked GUI OS, coded in their home-grown Pascal, with their home-grown touchpad pointer and home-grown token-ring network, on those and on actual 68K into the late '80s. Aegis was inspired by MULTICS, not Unix, and was definitely a better system. They were demand-paging across the network in the…
> Aegis was inspired by MULTICS, not Unix, and was definitely a better system. They were demand-paging across the network in the early '80s. I’d love to see one of those operating. We have lost so many great ideas we seem to never revisit…