It costs $436 to deploy a smartcontract on Ethereum
1–10 of 121 posts
Re: It costs $436 to deploy a smartcontract on Ethereum
#2Re: It costs $436 to deploy a smartcontract on Ethereum
#3Re: It costs $436 to deploy a smartcontract on Ethereum
#4Re: It costs $436 to deploy a smartcontract on Ethereum
#5Solana FTW! It appears to be the top alternative, especially if you love Rust.
Re: It costs $436 to deploy a smartcontract on Ethereum
#6Solana FTW! It appears to be the top alternative, especially if you love Rust.
Solana is a fully centralized chain completely controlled by its creators, as evidenced by their recent unilateral shutdown on the last bug. Regular blockchains are already utterly useless, but they have the benefit of being decentralized. Solana is a scam, and so are 99% of the chains being created.
Curious why you think so? Also agree Solana is quite centralized but I wouldn't say it's a scam.
Re: It costs $436 to deploy a smartcontract on Ethereum
#7Re: It costs $436 to deploy a smartcontract on Ethereum
#8Solana FTW! It appears to be the top alternative, especially if you love Rust.
Solana is a fully centralized chain completely controlled by its creators, as evidenced by their recent unilateral shutdown on the last bug. Regular blockchains are already utterly useless, but they have the benefit of being decentralized. Solana is a scam, and so are 99% of the chains being created.
Re: It costs $436 to deploy a smartcontract on Ethereum
#9A few years ago, deploying a smart contract only cost a few dollars. It raised questions like “wouldn’t anyone then spam the blockchain and increase its size in non-scalable way?” I guess pricing “solved” that issue.
We considered Avalanche as an alternative, as it supports the same VM for smart contracts, but integrations with tools (metamask, etherjs) and services (infura, opensea) is not there yet, and or course everybody is on Ethereum anyway so there’s an egg and chicken issue at play.
Re: It costs $436 to deploy a smartcontract on Ethereum
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Solana is a fully centralized chain completely controlled by its creators, as evidenced by their recent unilateral shutdown on the last bug. Regular blockchains are already utterly useless, but they have the benefit of being decentralized. Solana is a scam, and so are 99% of the chains being created.
> Regular blockchains are already utterly useless Curious why you think so? Also agree Solana is quite centralized but I wouldn't say it's a scam.
There's also no disclosure on what price did the initial round happen at. 40 cents/80 cents /1$? If you buy Gold/Copper you have a fair idea on what the mining cost is for the industry. These are just fairytales propagated by further vc money to build more virtual fantasies on the database they control.