I really don’t understand the appeal of this “gamer“ aesthetic. Colorful LEDs, huge liquid coolers… definitively not for me.
Linux on the Desktop: Part Two
31–40 of 75 posts
Re: Linux on the Desktop: Part Two
#32When you switch to Linux (desktop), you should seek something that Windows cannot offer. I'm my case, it was possibility of having desktop where change for the sake of change is completely absent. My desktop is fully up to date, yet it hasn't changed visually since 2006. Every control and menu item is where it was 15 years ago, colors are the same, fonts are the same. I'm not using OS, I'm using apps. The best thing…
So keeping the desktop static is not as important as keeping the desktop stable, imho. Which is why I just use vanilla Gnome. (with some dconf edits to improve speed and stability)
Re: Linux on the Desktop: Part Two
#33When you switch to Linux (desktop), you should seek something that Windows cannot offer. I'm my case, it was possibility of having desktop where change for the sake of change is completely absent. My desktop is fully up to date, yet it hasn't changed visually since 2006. Every control and menu item is where it was 15 years ago, colors are the same, fonts are the same. I'm not using OS, I'm using apps. The best thing…
This _can_ be true, but GNOME (for example) have drastically changed their UI paradigm in that time window. It's quite nice as a power user, I use terminals and.. overall terminals and tiling window managers barely change. But the pace of change can be jarring, and sometimes controversial: GNOME2->3 init->systemd alsa->pulse->pipewire ifconfig->ip NetworkManager->iwctl A lot of the ergonomics _do_ change with Linux i…
Re: Linux on the Desktop: Part Two
#34When you switch to Linux (desktop), you should seek something that Windows cannot offer. I'm my case, it was possibility of having desktop where change for the sake of change is completely absent. My desktop is fully up to date, yet it hasn't changed visually since 2006. Every control and menu item is where it was 15 years ago, colors are the same, fonts are the same. I'm not using OS, I'm using apps. The best thing…
Re: Linux on the Desktop: Part Two
#35Funny, my primary work is UI and front-end, I was Apple user for 20 years and now I am in Linux Desktop land without any problem what so ever. Finally after long years of fiddling with chaos of markdown files I invested the time and switched to Emacs and org-mode. Affinity Designer is running fine under VM, Figma-linux is delight to work with, KDE with middle gray color palette ( as all professional software must be,…
Usually i find the default/light options too bright and the dark options too dark.
Re: Linux on the Desktop: Part Two
#36I was looking at mITX boards, but microATX just seems better overall. Cheaper, better VRMs (can even overclock), 4 RAM slots, more onboard drive slots, extra PCIe slots (more SSDs, ports, or a fiber link to your NAS or Wifi, but that's easier with a LAN-to-OpenWRT router). I didn't know a mITX board could handle a Ryzen 9 though.
I would also wager the vast majority of people who have a PC only use one SATA or NVMe socket/slot and only have a GPU as an add-in. This makes, for the most part, an mATX board mostly as used as an mITX board in terms of features.
My first generation AM4 mITX board that I built with a Ryzen 7 1700X can handle the 3000 series Ryzen 9 CPUs just fine.
https://www.asrock.com/mb/AMD/Fatal1ty%20AB350%20Gaming-ITXa...
Even the Ryzen 9 3950X.
I recently did a rebuild and got another mITX AM4 board.
https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/B550I-AORUS-PRO-AX-rev-...
It handles all Ryzen 3000, 4000 and 5000 CPUs. Including the 16 core Ryzen 9 5950X.
Size =/= Quality of Board.
Re: Linux on the Desktop: Part Two
#37When you switch to Linux (desktop), you should seek something that Windows cannot offer. I'm my case, it was possibility of having desktop where change for the sake of change is completely absent. My desktop is fully up to date, yet it hasn't changed visually since 2006. Every control and menu item is where it was 15 years ago, colors are the same, fonts are the same. I'm not using OS, I'm using apps. The best thing…
Well, my Windows applications from 2000 can still run on Windows 10, without being recompiled, regardless of the UI changes.
And Wine/Proton is (i would say) more compatible with old Windows-Apps then Windows itself, not even talking about dosbox/dosbox-x.
Re: Linux on the Desktop: Part Two
#38Funny, my primary work is UI and front-end, I was Apple user for 20 years and now I am in Linux Desktop land without any problem what so ever. Finally after long years of fiddling with chaos of markdown files I invested the time and switched to Emacs and org-mode. Affinity Designer is running fine under VM, Figma-linux is delight to work with, KDE with middle gray color palette ( as all professional software must be,…
I'm really interested what you mean by middle-gray color palette. Do you use one of the downloadable color schemes or do you fine-tune it yourself? Usually i find the default/light options too bright and the dark options too dark.
I fine tune it my self, there is a room for interpretation over basic middle gray as lightness value, you can colorize it with subtle bluish, greenish or warm colors.
Soundtrack Pro example is well balanced implementation. When they released it I thought that this will be the default pro UI theme in MacOS.
But iPhone came around and Apple left all Pro Software and Audience behind.
Re: Linux on the Desktop: Part Two
#39Bluetooth drops out from my headphones once in a while, I can't find decent open software to control the fans in the machine, and getting sound passthrough to work from an audi o input had to be done via the commandline, but apart from that it's been an ok experience.
I'll note that I'd previously given the latest Ubuntu a go, but the UI/WM is a complete and utter mess. Mint is much cleaner.
Re: Linux on the Desktop: Part Two
#40Fascinating as the desktop computer and running Linux on it are, I find the blog's domain name (in Japanese, is it Katakana?) and HN's rendering of the URL even more riveting.
The name as displayed on HN is the "real" domain name, it's a format called Punycode, used to allow Unicode domain names despite DNS only allowing a subset of ASCII characters. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_domain_name https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode
I believe Chrome users can do this as well, however it requires an extension.