I should also point out that signing into Libby and Kobo is somewhat annoying. You need to sign in to both using your overdrive in some specific way. I found the answer in some Reddit thread after some Google searching.
I like e-readers now
161–170 of 312 posts
Re: I like e-readers now
#162All I want is an e-Reader with USB-C. I refuse to buy any device which require me to use another charging cable.
Re: I like e-readers now
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
While I try to do that as much as possible it does not work with my country's version of overdrive. I have to use my e-reader and its awful browser to search for books I want to read. As the website is not even optimized for mobile devices the whole process is rather painful. But this is not the fault of the e-reader.
Amazon has their hooks deep into Overdrive in exchange for supporting Kindle delivery for library books, so I doubt this will ever get better. Overdrive has moved its focus to its mobile app. I hope Kobo support will improve, but I am not optimistic.
Re: I like e-readers now
#164Personally would love to use an e-reader to read lengthy blog posts, but last time I tried it was very tedious. I converted the post to PDF using firefox's reader mode and uploaded these to the device. Are there any e-readers with something like firefox's reader mode integrated?
Re: I like e-readers now
#165The PPI of eReaders don't seem that much higher than comparable high quality phones/tablets. Is there a theoretical explanation for why eReaders could be better for eye health?
Re: I like e-readers now
#166Is it really true that eReaders are easier on the eyes than comparable displays? (It seems true to me, anecdotally, but I'm curious if this is just a marketing campaign playing tricks on me). The PPI of eReaders don't seem that much higher than comparable high quality phones/tablets. Is there a theoretical explanation for why eReaders could be better for eye health?
Re: I like e-readers now
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
I realize it's irrational given the price of ebooks, but the lack of "ownership" of the books makes me a lot less interested in buying them.
Personally I very rarely re-read books so the concept of owning them just doesn't really matter to me. If my ebook collection suddenly disappeared I wouldn't particularly care, I already got the value out of them I was going to get. As for physical books, I'm trying to get rid of 200 or so I bought pre ebooks and damn it's a pain.
Re: I like e-readers now
#168Is it really true that eReaders are easier on the eyes than comparable displays? (It seems true to me, anecdotally, but I'm curious if this is just a marketing campaign playing tricks on me). The PPI of eReaders don't seem that much higher than comparable high quality phones/tablets. Is there a theoretical explanation for why eReaders could be better for eye health?
The main difference is they use e-paper displays which reflect light rather than emit it. Less eye strain due to less difference in amplitude to ambient light.
Re: I like e-readers now
#169Worth highlighting the Open Book Project [1], an open source e-reader hardware design and software stack. The design is open, and you can make your own with commodity parts. People are starting to sell PCBs, and complete devices. It has its own open software stack, and I hope will have a variety of vendors in the coming years. Ofc the e-ink patent issues remain, but this goes some of the way to solve things at the e-…
Super cool. I feel like the bigger struggle will be getting actual books. Unless you pirate them, most books are encumbered with DRM.
Re: I like e-readers now
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the obvious lack of features is so that you can have a focused, distraction-free experience This means the device is more of an appliance than a general computing device. A good example is a reMarkable 2. It is a solid, well-designed digital version of a paper notebook. (I will add paper notebooks aren't searchable.) Yes, anything else, including search, is bolted on but the core experience it was designed for isn'…
Actually, reMarkable is _precisely_ what I had in mind. Distraction-free is just an excuse for obviously unfinished software; just go and see which con most reviews agree on. The hardware is quite capable, but held back by the software.
It's fine if you don't like that feature, but not every customer would like them to "finish the software" by putting a highly functional browser on every e-reader. There's room in the market for both types of devices.