Millennials Not Having Babies Because of Climate Change

Post by vibrato2 » Tue, Sep 21, 2021, 2:24 PM UTC

drooby wrote: post #12

vibrato2 wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He’s one of the good people who can tell us the right way to do things. Never mind the 150k vaccine deaths.

150k vaccine deaths? Source please.

Post by jarpschop » Tue, Sep 21, 2021, 2:31 PM UTC

4asnarkycomment wrote: post #21

Rijek33 wrote: post #4

Highly religious people like Mormons and Amish have 3 kids on average, same for highly religious societies in Africa and Asia. Fun times ahead. Ironically from a darwinian point of view religion is a great adaptation for fitness

Or non-religion is a precursor to the kind of moral weakness that stunts a natural desire to reproduce? Maybe those who believe they are bringing souls into the world, rather than bags of meat and water, tend to have a more positive outlook on having children? Maybe those with no religion let the media's doomsday climate change scenarios become their version of Revelation?

Post by AnIdiotOnTheNet » Tue, Sep 21, 2021, 2:32 PM UTC

4asnarkycomment wrote: post #21

Rijek33 wrote: post #4

Highly religious people like Mormons and Amish have 3 kids on average, same for highly religious societies in Africa and Asia. Fun times ahead. Ironically from a darwinian point of view religion is a great adaptation for fitness

Or non-religion is a precursor to the kind of moral weakness that stunts a natural desire to reproduce? Maybe those who believe they are bringing souls into the world, rather than bags of meat and water, tend to have a more positive outlook on having children? Maybe those with no religion let the media's doomsday climate change scenarios become their version of Revelation?

Post by thatguy0900 » Tue, Sep 21, 2021, 2:35 PM UTC

4asnarkycomment wrote: post #21

Rijek33 wrote: post #4

Highly religious people like Mormons and Amish have 3 kids on average, same for highly religious societies in Africa and Asia. Fun times ahead. Ironically from a darwinian point of view religion is a great adaptation for fitness

Or non-religion is a precursor to the kind of moral weakness that stunts a natural desire to reproduce? Maybe those who believe they are bringing souls into the world, rather than bags of meat and water, tend to have a more positive outlook on having children? Maybe those with no religion let the media's doomsday climate change scenarios become their version of Revelation?

Post by makerofspoons » Tue, Sep 21, 2021, 2:39 PM UTC

rebelos wrote: post #27

What's especially stupid about this is that almost nobody knows that we have a quite workable backup plan (solar geoengineering). It's not ideal but at some point it will have to be deployed. It'll be relatively cost effective and can be 'tuned' quite easily.