Earlier quoted context omitted.
> They've never been team players. Don't forget they were happily building Nazi tank parts in WWII while playing nice with the allies. Please tell me what they could have done instead, being locked between a nazi-occupied country (Norway), one at war and partially occupied by the Soviets (Finland) and with a military monster to the south. Sweden had to play nice or risk being squashed like a bug. Pretty much the same…
Understood, I never really got why the Nazis left Sweden alone but did go after Norway and Denmark. And at the same time were so hell-bent on conquering the empty deserts in North Africa. But those ball bearings and other parts helped kill a lot of allies.
Because Sweden had a credible military. Not that she could have resisted indefinitely to a German invasion, but subduing her would have taken time the Axis did not have.
> And at the same time were so hell-bent on conquering the empty deserts in North Africa.
Sweden was neutral. Britain and Free France weren't.
> But those ball bearings and other parts helped kill a lot of allies.
Poland was an ally. It was split between Germany and the Soviet Union (and sold off to the Soviets after the war, but that was yet to come). Do you think Sweden should have sacrificed herself after seeing that?