Live data from Hacker News

Single Family Zoning is now banned in California

timesheraldonline.com

101–105 of 105 posts

Re: Single Family Zoning is now banned in California

#101
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure about that last part. In general the people who own single family homes in the Bay Area have had nimby opposition to more dense housing being constructed since more supply lowers prices.

More supply also increases traffic. This isn't just about everyone worrying about their housing prices (there are a lot of NIMBY reasons beyond that).

It also increases the need for new infrastructure, such as electric wires, sewer/plumbing, trash/sanitation, schools, police, fire stations, etc. You can't just plop Moar Housing down and call it a day. You need to build these things, too.

Re: Single Family Zoning is now banned in California

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More supply also increases traffic. This isn't just about everyone worrying about their housing prices (there are a lot of NIMBY reasons beyond that).

Only if you don’t build up walkable areas and public transport. With high density housing many people won’t even own cars as there is not much point.

That’s how it works in the densest cities. The problem occurs if you get density first without that.

Re: Single Family Zoning is now banned in California

#103
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure about that last part. In general the people who own single family homes in the Bay Area have had nimby opposition to more dense housing being constructed since more supply lowers prices.

More supply also increases traffic. This isn't just about everyone worrying about their housing prices (there are a lot of NIMBY reasons beyond that).

More office space also contributes to increasing traffic yet curiously there is no widespread, organized NIMBY opposition to offices like there is to housing units.
Post reply on HN