These glasses look ridiculous, i can’t understand how a brand like ray-ban throws their name in for what looks like spy glasses https://www.ray-ban.com/usa/electronics/RW4004%20UNISEX%20RA...
Ireland raises privacy question over Facebook smart glasses
131–140 of 152 posts
Re: Ireland raises privacy question over Facebook smart glasses
#132Re: Ireland raises privacy question over Facebook smart glasses
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not FB. It's progress. You can replace them with any other name in the world. It just happens to be that Facebook announced this rather obvious technology.
In fact, Snapchat has had a similar product for a while with Spectacles[0]. 0: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12569182
Re: Ireland raises privacy question over Facebook smart glasses
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
THat's my thought, too. Anyone who wants to hide a camera on their person can do so easily. A small hole in a shirt, coat, or hat can conceal a lens and cameras can be tiny. Yet nobody's rushing out to pass laws against "concealable cameras" in general.
You also have to see how easy these will be to use, with a dedicated app and all, compared to hiding a camera. In practice, if I spot a hidden cam on someone interacting with me in public, I’d call them out, but socially it would e super awkward to ask someone to put their glasses away. But I agree the FB association might be making people extra uncomfortable (can’t blame them!)
Re: Ireland raises privacy question over Facebook smart glasses
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
In fact, Snapchat has had a similar product for a while with Spectacles[0]. 0: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12569182
Ah, more of Zuckerberg's jealousy because Snapchat refused their acquisition offer?
This sounds like a complement, to be honest. If we get awesome, real, AR glasses because Zuckerberg is jealous, then more power to him.
Re: Ireland raises privacy question over Facebook smart glasses
#136I know this will get DVed but this seems like one of those things we'll look back on in 20yrs and "mostly" wonder what all the fuss was about. AR cameras seem inevitable. They're strange today but ask any 2006 non-techie if they'd consider carrying a pocket computer and they'd laugh at you. Now they all have one and you'd likely only get them to part with it from their cold dead fingers. The privacy issues are a huge…
That depends on the question you ask, if you ask them if they want to carry a bulky device they will say no, but if you ask that the device will be very small, light, sleek and you can make calls and check email and browse the internet, almost everyone will say yes.
Re: Ireland raises privacy question over Facebook smart glasses
#137I know this will get DVed but this seems like one of those things we'll look back on in 20yrs and "mostly" wonder what all the fuss was about. AR cameras seem inevitable. They're strange today but ask any 2006 non-techie if they'd consider carrying a pocket computer and they'd laugh at you. Now they all have one and you'd likely only get them to part with it from their cold dead fingers. The privacy issues are a huge…
The fuss is about the "Facebook" bit, not the "smart glasses" bit. I want smart glasses that are mine, not Mark's.
Re: Ireland raises privacy question over Facebook smart glasses
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
That doesn’t make sense, at least staying with your second sentence. Many examples of police brutality have come to light that would have otherwise been hidden had we had no cameras.
My point was that there are many cases where different people view the footage and simply disagree about whether the violence was justified.
Re: Ireland raises privacy question over Facebook smart glasses
#139I know this will get DVed but this seems like one of those things we'll look back on in 20yrs and "mostly" wonder what all the fuss was about. AR cameras seem inevitable. They're strange today but ask any 2006 non-techie if they'd consider carrying a pocket computer and they'd laugh at you. Now they all have one and you'd likely only get them to part with it from their cold dead fingers. The privacy issues are a huge…
The world you're describing sounds like hell to me. I'd rather become Amish than live in it. Also, I would point out that the advent of police cameras has by no means ended controversies over police brutality. It has simply revealed what should have been obvious: we do not agree about what constitues police brutality. I expect the same would be true when it comes to sex.
Also, a reality where everything is recorded all the time would enable some nightmarish forms of social control that it would seem hard to escape from. Imagine an abusive husband that insists on performing a daily review of all activities.
Re: Ireland raises privacy question over Facebook smart glasses
#140Yet, will it be assumed I am a glass hole for wearing these, peer pressure from the paranoid! Done nothing wrong yet judged and punished ...