Mossad assassinated Iran’s chief nuke scientist with remote AI gun – report

Post by coder583 » Sat, Sep 18, 2021, 10:34 PM UTC

FridayoLeary wrote: post #98

benbenbenjerry wrote: post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How bizarre for you to sidestep the issue and go after issues with the laws of Iran! In what country is it legal to assassinate a scientist?

He's a nuclear scientist. Working on a nuclear bomb. For Iran. Wich is run by radical extremists. He's essentially a terrorist. Albeit one who goes around in a white lab coat as opposed to a machine gun and who has never harmed a fly but is more dangerous than the entire taliban put together.

Post by coder583 » Sat, Sep 18, 2021, 10:38 PM UTC

yyyk wrote: post #101

_fnhr wrote: post #9

So this is a public bragging about illegally putting a gun in a foreign country and assassinating a person, all the while being comfortably sure that no national or international pushback will come. Quite disturbing to read.

It's more disturbing to read complaints about a strike against a brigadier general, where two countries are at war with each other, a mere few days after we learnt the US droned 10 civilians in Kabul as a 'retaliation' for an IS strike. We at HN should look inwards on this one.

Post by readonthegoapp » Sat, Sep 18, 2021, 10:42 PM UTC

koheripbal wrote: post #34

_fnhr wrote: post #9

So this is a public bragging about illegally putting a gun in a foreign country and assassinating a person, all the while being comfortably sure that no national or international pushback will come. Quite disturbing to read.

There is no world court or legal structure. The word "illegal" has no meaning in international affairs.

Post by sgregnt » Sat, Sep 18, 2021, 10:48 PM UTC

ianleeclark wrote: post #32

sgregnt wrote: post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a leak like hundred of other leaks. But, it seems like you are trying to push a certain agenda and paint the info in a certain way. Here's another way to frame the same info: At least someone tries to prevent a war and prevent bad actors from obtaining nuclear weapons.

> Here's another way to frame the same info: At least someone tries to prevent a war and prevent bad actors from obtaining nuclear weapons. We used to have inspectors to do such a thing. Now we're just left with an incredibly convenient Schrodingers nuke to keep those not yet fatigued in a constant state of fear.

Post by LegitShady » Sat, Sep 18, 2021, 10:58 PM UTC

FridayoLeary wrote: post #103

bawolff wrote: post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I imagine they will continue to do whatever they think serves their geopolitical position best. Nukes would give iran a significant power boost and bargaining chip, but it wouldn't magically make them rulers of the world. Iran's geopolitical enemies would still try to contain them, iran would still try and not be contained. Similar to what happened when the soviets got nukes, but on a much smaller regional scale.

The only local enemies capable of containing Iran is Israel. Even the Saudis are afraid of Iran. Hence the Abraham Accords and a peace treaty between Israel and Saudi Arabia is imminent. And Israel isn't intimidating every single one of its neighbours and trying to control them and starting proxy wars with them. And committing acts of terror against random Iranians all over the world. So Israel have the moral upper g…