Live data from Hacker News

GNU/Linux Open Hardware PowerPC Notebook Project

powerpc-notebook.org

1–10 of 69 posts

Re: GNU/Linux Open Hardware PowerPC Notebook Project

#2
Using PPC in a laptop form factor is a really confusing choice, given that Apple abandoned PPC [1] in their laptops for Intel because they judged that there was no way that IBM was ever going to come out with a PPC chip that was ever going to be as power efficient as the comparable Intel parts. Their "Why PPC" page [2] makes no mention of power or thermal efficiency, and just states that PowerPC is better because the original version of the ISA was invented after x86 and ARM. By that logic Itanium is the best ISA of all!

[1] https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/opinion-technol...

[2] https://www.powerpc-notebook.org/why-powerpc/

Re: GNU/Linux Open Hardware PowerPC Notebook Project

#3

Using PPC in a laptop form factor is a really confusing choice, given that Apple abandoned PPC [1] in their laptops for Intel because they judged that there was no way that IBM was ever going to come out with a PPC chip that was ever going to be as power efficient as the comparable Intel parts. Their "Why PPC" page [2] makes no mention of power or thermal efficiency, and just states that PowerPC is better because the…

Because Open hardware.

Re: GNU/Linux Open Hardware PowerPC Notebook Project

#7

Using PPC in a laptop form factor is a really confusing choice, given that Apple abandoned PPC [1] in their laptops for Intel because they judged that there was no way that IBM was ever going to come out with a PPC chip that was ever going to be as power efficient as the comparable Intel parts. Their "Why PPC" page [2] makes no mention of power or thermal efficiency, and just states that PowerPC is better because the…

Apple has since moved off of x86 for similar reasons. The issue is the fab process more than the architecture.

Re: GNU/Linux Open Hardware PowerPC Notebook Project

#8
post #3

Using PPC in a laptop form factor is a really confusing choice, given that Apple abandoned PPC [1] in their laptops for Intel because they judged that there was no way that IBM was ever going to come out with a PPC chip that was ever going to be as power efficient as the comparable Intel parts. Their "Why PPC" page [2] makes no mention of power or thermal efficiency, and just states that PowerPC is better because the…

Because Open hardware.

I figure someone might as well go whole-hog on that and build a PC with just a big ol' FPGA.

Re: GNU/Linux Open Hardware PowerPC Notebook Project

#9
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because Open hardware.

I figure someone might as well go whole-hog on that and build a PC with just a big ol' FPGA.

Fpgas are very unsuitable general purpose computers. De10 nano is a very beefy fpga and can barely play doom acting like a general purpose 486 and lacks a fpga

Re: GNU/Linux Open Hardware PowerPC Notebook Project

#10

Using PPC in a laptop form factor is a really confusing choice, given that Apple abandoned PPC [1] in their laptops for Intel because they judged that there was no way that IBM was ever going to come out with a PPC chip that was ever going to be as power efficient as the comparable Intel parts. Their "Why PPC" page [2] makes no mention of power or thermal efficiency, and just states that PowerPC is better because the…

Many, myself included, would gladly take a major hit in battery life if it means having a machine we can actually trust.

Trust means no ME backdoors, no random blobs which can be supply chain attack vectors.

Freedom means I can do anything I want to the software and firmware and repair anything as needed long term without the consent of a corporation that has a financial interest in seeing their hardware go to a landfill in 2 years so people buy the latest.

Post reply on HN