Live data from Hacker News

Pieces of Shit

geohot.github.io

1–10 of 84 posts

Re: Pieces of Shit

#2
> A 500% tax on advertising. It’s a zero sum game with no benefit to society.

I don't think a tax is going to fix the underlying problem, which is that ad publishers have no responsibility for the ads they show.

The problem is that the scummiest advertisers can afford to pay the highest prices.

Someone who defrauds you can always afford to pay more for advertising than someone who actually provides a service.

Re: Pieces of Shit

#4
> Continue to let huge ad companies (stop calling them tech companies) rent seek and nickel and dime you on everything

What is he referring to here, out of curiosity? Does a company like Google own an apartment complex, or is it some sort of on-site housing programme?

Re: Pieces of Shit

#5
post #2

> A 500% tax on advertising. It’s a zero sum game with no benefit to society. I don't think a tax is going to fix the underlying problem, which is that ad publishers have no responsibility for the ads they show. The problem is that the scummiest advertisers can afford to pay the highest prices. Someone who defrauds you can always afford to pay more for advertising than someone who actually provides a service.

> I don't think a tax is going to fix the underlying problem, which is that ad publishers have no responsibility for the ads they show.

The tax would get passed on to the entity paying for the advertisement. Then "advertising" would probably turn into a dirty word, we'll have "suggestions" and some sort of legal ducking and diving to avoid paying the tax at all.

Advertising plagues the web.

Re: Pieces of Shit

#7

> Continue to let huge ad companies (stop calling them tech companies) rent seek and nickel and dime you on everything What is he referring to here, out of curiosity? Does a company like Google own an apartment complex, or is it some sort of on-site housing programme?

AirBnb and the like maybe?

Re: Pieces of Shit

#8

> Continue to let huge ad companies (stop calling them tech companies) rent seek and nickel and dime you on everything What is he referring to here, out of curiosity? Does a company like Google own an apartment complex, or is it some sort of on-site housing programme?

This isn't referring to housing. Rent-seeking is a broader term related to charging people for something that they have no reason to pay for and no ability to avoid.

I see why the confusion arose though, "actual" housing is also mentioned in the article in a different context.

Re: Pieces of Shit

#10

More than a little hypocritical to complain about crypto scams, when he himself created this "cheap eth" coin, gave himself a bajillion coins in the fork code without telling anyone, and then started shilling it in his stream. More info: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26175655

[deleted]
Post reply on HN