71–80 of 111 posts
Another nice minimalist one is https://micro.blog/ It has mentions, but "strong community guidelines that are enforced" (from the homepage).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hey! I'm the person who made this — I don't believe there's an actual problem here, since login cookies are set on the top-level domain (and thus are inaccessible to content on subdomains), and are HTTPOnly as well. I do notice that Stripe sets a tracking cookie (which only happens for people who pay for the service, since I don't load the Stripe JS elsewhere), so you could track pageviews with that or something. Tha…
https://nsfw-attack-demo.thoughts.page/ (not actually NSFW, just there to serve a point)
is it just me, or is tweeting into the void kinda sad?
No, I think it's brilliant. I think we'd see more interesting writing on the internet if it didn't always start with the goal of acquiring and maintaining an audience.
is it just me, or is tweeting into the void kinda sad?
sorry to crash here, but I've made a version of it before. If people want try and give some feedback: https://logfile.app
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hey! I'm the person who made this — I don't believe there's an actual problem here, since login cookies are set on the top-level domain (and thus are inaccessible to content on subdomains), and are HTTPOnly as well. I do notice that Stripe sets a tracking cookie (which only happens for people who pay for the service, since I don't load the Stripe JS elsewhere), so you could track pageviews with that or something. Tha…
>allowing people to use arbitrary HTML and JS was an intentional choice Oh, you'll be reversing this choice VERY quickly if your product gets any traction, I assure you...
Yes, the pages can publish illegal information, be set up as phishing hubs, but none of that is as a result of JS being executable. Web hosts all have exactly the same risks to deal with, their users can also host anything they wish.
The owner's challenge is with the content they are opening up to hosting, and it will become an overhead to police that. If they decide to add buttons like "report content" then those will be able to be hijacked by the publisher and become useless.
> i can appreciate the self loathing of someone who says they work on "merkle trees" instead of blockchain tbh > like, yeah bro we all get what you're saying but i'm glad you at least realize you should be ashamed of it [1] Thank god thoughts like these can finally be shared in a better way… cute project but by someone who apparently doesn’t appreciate what other people work on. [1]: https://wesleyac.thoughts.page/#1…
is it just me, or is tweeting into the void kinda sad?
> ...is tweeting into the void kinda sad? No, I think it's brilliant. I think we'd see more interesting writing on the internet if it didn't always start with the goal of acquiring and maintaining an audience.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah it's an interesting model. I'm guessing it works on an honour system as income isn't easily verifiable
In Norway, everyone's income is public information. Other countries could do the same to make things more transparent.
(please don't use my comment as a soapbox to start a labor rights debate)