Earlier quoted context omitted.
While "no" social mobility is a bit extreme, social mobility has drastically reduced in america. Here is a pretty famous paper showing so: https://www.nber.org/papers/w19843 Personal responsibility can only take you so far if getting hold or keeping hold of such opportunities are hard in the first place
I read the abstract and skipped around some but I couldn't find it referencing a change in mobility over time. I did notice it says some areas have high mobility still: > The U.S. is better described as a collection of societies, some of which are “lands of opportunity” with high rates of mobility across generations, and others in which few children escape poverty. I see in some charts online that social mobility has…
https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w19844/w198...
This website summarizes a couple of key points from other papers from that author:
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility-memos/2018/01...
> 3. Rates of relative intergenerational mobility in the U.S. appear to have been flat for decades
> 4. It is a different story, however, for absolute mobility – which indicates how well a person does compared to their parents in absolute terms, rather than relative ones. On this measure of mobility, the last few decades have seen a sharp decline.
So I guess a better way to put it would be to say that because of rising costs in healthcare and housing etc, the social ladder has become more slippery; an accident or a medical emergency has a much bigger chance to push you down the social ladder that from earlier years.