Live data from Hacker News

Anonymous Hacks Epik

4chan.partyvan.epikfail.win

11–20 of 284 posts

Re: Anonymous Hacks Epik

#11
Eventually the cloud is going to burst and everyone’s data will be public. The motive will be similar to this one, where a huge blast radius of collateral damage is accepted in the name of harming bad people. Seeing people eagerly download this data that surely includes countless amounts of personal info of non-Nazis shows this clearly.

Re: Anonymous Hacks Epik

#13
> OFFICIAL ANONYMOUS (not to be confused with 'Anonymous Official' grifters)

They should sign an ethereum address to reduce ambiguity

(Any crypto asset address is fine, even PGP is good enough for this but PGP had 25 years to make that user friendly and common but failed, and cryptocurrencies made signing software more prevalent and uniform wayyyyy faster)

Re: Anonymous Hacks Epik

#14
post #11

Eventually the cloud is going to burst and everyone’s data will be public. The motive will be similar to this one, where a huge blast radius of collateral damage is accepted in the name of harming bad people. Seeing people eagerly download this data that surely includes countless amounts of personal info of non-Nazis shows this clearly.

How many just regular folks would actually pick Epik? Why?

Re: Anonymous Hacks Epik

#15

Epik pushed back against the mob, particularly against Chad Loder who some consider (according to Andy Ngo) to be an Antifa extremist. No doubt this was retaliation. https://t.co/LUvexnk0fk

I'm being downed for reporting on the information that I have about this? Fine. Downvote me a thousands times I will not hold my tongue. ADD: I pointed out the info was from Andy Ngo so that people could take that into account according to their own view of him. EDIT2: Ok, I got the order of events backwards.

Re: Anonymous Hacks Epik

#16
post #11

Eventually the cloud is going to burst and everyone’s data will be public. The motive will be similar to this one, where a huge blast radius of collateral damage is accepted in the name of harming bad people. Seeing people eagerly download this data that surely includes countless amounts of personal info of non-Nazis shows this clearly.

Fortunately, given the purported scope of the hack, it seems we'll be able to actually quantify that. How many of the websites weren't hosting violent or extremist content? If this is real, we should be able to get an exact percentage.

Re: Anonymous Hacks Epik

#18

Looks like the seeder is gone, but they were online just barely briefly enough to get the torrent metadata. For those that are curious what's in there: https://gist.github.com/Q726kbXuN/57f3825493d04867c3d192fd93...

Looks like just a pretty standard WP frontend. Not really much of value.

Thats because that page doesnt show the full list. Try this instead

https://gist.github.com/Q726kbXuN/57f3825493d04867c3d192fd93...

Re: Anonymous Hacks Epik

#19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looks like just a pretty standard WP frontend. Not really much of value.

Thats because that page doesnt show the full list. Try this instead https://gist.github.com/Q726kbXuN/57f3825493d04867c3d192fd93...

Or just click on "view the full file" to see the full list.
Post reply on HN