81–90 of 113 posts
wow, I am the 49,200,124th user? we should see who can get the lowest score...
4:Mark Zuck 5:Chris Hughes 6:Dustin Muskovitz 7:Arie Hasit 8,9 Dont Work 10:Marcel Laverdet 11:Soleio Cuervo 12 Doesnt Work 13 Chris Putnam (wtf?...i thought he joined facebook much later..hmmm interesting!)
anyone care to finish up to 20!!
{"is_fb_employee":"maybe soon? https://www.facebook.com/careers/department.php?dept=enginee... }
Thats funny actually =)
EDIT: Oh, I did put my profession. Stupid me.
That's cute but it's not accurate. I interviewed there over two years ago and I appear to be blacklisted, since whenever I look at any of their job descriptions I get this: "Hey, we have reviewed your application and unfortunately don't have an opening for you." I can't really square that with "Maybe soon?"
Earlier quoted context omitted.
We get it, you guys have seen Office Space. It doesn't contribute positively to the discussion.
The only thing that stands as a non-contribution is your need to publicly proclaim a lack of a sense of humor.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
600,343 (343rd user at Penn) Assuming similar adoption rates at the 4 other "second wave" schools, I'm probably one of the first 5-10k users of Facebook.
May I ask how you know your join-order at your school?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The only thing that stands as a non-contribution is your need to publicly proclaim a lack of a sense of humor.
It's occasionally helpful to explain to people why they're being downvoted. Comments that consist of pop culture references usually aren't treated kindly.
Now, seriously talking. A joke doesn't hurt a discussion. Laugh and move on. Or even better, keep making jokes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thats funny actually =)
How do they know that I actually fit in that department and not in Marketing? Like... I never put who my employee was or my profession.. EDIT: Oh, I did put my profession. Stupid me.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hm, I think you can still invoke it jsonp style and overload the Object constructor in older browsers though, right? This would not only tell you whether they were a FB employee, but perhaps more importantly, their facebook UID without needing them to agree to any OAuth access.
That only works if it's surrounded by parenthesies. A bare object literal is not syntactically valid JavaScript.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The same origin policy in browsers will stop you from doing that.
Can't you use a JSONP request?
Because you'd need to use a proxy on your domain to convert the feed to JSONP, you would then lose access to the client's cookies for the target domain. That basically means that no, you can't use a JSONP request to defeat the same-origin policy.