Live data from Hacker News

Facebook has exempted high-profile users from some or all of its rules

wsj.com

341–350 of 549 posts

Re: Facebook has exempted high-profile users from some or all of its rules

#341
Having a bad credit can really cause you a lot , I had a very bad credit of 460 but it was later fixed by DOOMHACKS@BK.RU , They boosted my credit to 810 in all three bureaus .. They made me believe in credit hacks again after i have been ripped off several times trying to get my credit fixed .. Reach out to them if you need yours fixed as well +1 812 509 3064

Re: Facebook has exempted high-profile users from some or all of its rules

#342
post #183

It seems like no one has figured out a good system for moderation on the internet. IIUC, Facebook hired contractors to do it, then realized that that didn't work and created XCheck to cover the visible cases, and is now in trouble because XCheck also doesn't work and rubber-stamps everything. Even before this there were news stories about the horribleness of those contract moderator jobs. Reddit tried to federate mod…

HN only works because YC doesn't sell ads and explicitly treats it as a loss leader to support their investing business.

I wouldn't be surprise if they turn a profit on YC running sentiment analysis. The website seems like it isn't the most expensive to host either.

Re: Facebook has exempted high-profile users from some or all of its rules

#343

I got banned yesterday for quoting a nazi official on propaganda: “Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred.” - Joseph Goebbels Yeah. Facebook fucking sucks. Oh, the reason? Encourages danger and violence (which in their broad definition now includes quoting individuals who were associated to dangerous regimes). Welcome to the day and age in which another organiza…

[deleted]

Re: Facebook has exempted high-profile users from some or all of its rules

#344

It is extremely distressing that a few companies, all located in the same country, and many located in the same state, if not quite the same city, run by a few men with similar politics has the immense power that they do. Some people do not quite understand why. Imagine in they were all Russian and owned by friends of Putin. It should be a matter of national security for other nations to develop regional competitors.…

If you zoom out, it's not especially concerning.

The history of media companies suggests all of these companies will become less influential in little time. A few people used to own radio stations. Then it was TV stations. Overlapping them was newspapers/magazines. Things come and go, they tend to concentrate power, but they don't seem to last very long. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Youtube are young. There is little indication they'll have much influence in 20 years.

Re: Facebook has exempted high-profile users from some or all of its rules

#345

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not to mention, imagine the hubris necessary to want this as a company, and consider oneself the sole (or few of) moderator of human communication to police and curate absolutely everything that gets shared, according to a single prescribed narrative by their political partners, and their team of fact checkers complete with their implicit biases, who are funded by extreme partisan players who won the Elite Olympics™…

It's honestly pretty easy to imagine. Given any company with a clarified goal, the default answer to "How much of the market do we want?" is "All of it." Rare is the company that sets as a goal "10% of the potential customers."

I enjoy working for a company that realizes we'll never have the entire market and is fine with the fact that there is plenty of space for multiple competitors to do well.

I've been at companies where "we want to be number 1, win all the awards, and defeat the competition" and I get where that comes from... a certain amount of that is healthy, but it can also get very twisted. I'd rather not.

Re: Facebook has exempted high-profile users from some or all of its rules

#346

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm in the same boat. Trying my best to de-FAANG my life. Self hosting as much as possible, with as little management overhead as possible, but I'm still stuck on Android and I don't know how to break free.

Which self-hosting software do you recommend?

I'm self hosting Ghost for blogging, Home Assistant for smart home controller, and in the middle of setting up Vaultwarden for passwords. I also run a lot of stuff off my Synology - Synology Drive instead of Dropbox or Google Drive, Synology Photos instead of Google Photos. I don't have a great solution for email or phone - emails is paid hosting through Zoho and use Android for phone. I'd like to get off those. It's all a long drawn out process.

Re: Facebook has exempted high-profile users from some or all of its rules

#347

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not to mention, imagine the hubris necessary to want this as a company, and consider oneself the sole (or few of) moderator of human communication to police and curate absolutely everything that gets shared, according to a single prescribed narrative by their political partners, and their team of fact checkers complete with their implicit biases, who are funded by extreme partisan players who won the Elite Olympics™…

It's honestly pretty easy to imagine. Given any company with a clarified goal, the default answer to "How much of the market do we want?" is "All of it." Rare is the company that sets as a goal "10% of the potential customers."

That's not true at all. Plenty of people run lifestyle businesses whose goal is to support themselves and their families, friends, and employees. One example is Aquarium Co-Op [1] who is into promoting the aquarium hobby in all its facets. Cory, the owner, is very frank about the costs of running his business and how he often sells products at or below cost because he believes they're important to the community. A far cry from big tech companies seemingly bent on world domination.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/c/Aquariumcoop

Re: Facebook has exempted high-profile users from some or all of its rules

#348
post #339
post #307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

absurdly tone deaf, as in, does not warrant good faith engagement, “don’t feed the trolls”.

If you're not interested in good faith engagement then I'd suggest not posting in the comments section. It's what we're here for.

Please consider the power dynamics here. The HN community owes no favors to FB or FB former staff. When a former FB staff member logs on to post the kind of response they posted, community members may stand up and call them out on their trolling. I accept the consequences of my behavior (as my comments arguably violate HN guidelines), and am open to learning more about the FB’s behavior, from good faith commenters on both sides.

Re: Facebook has exempted high-profile users from some or all of its rules

#349

I got banned yesterday for quoting a nazi official on propaganda: “Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred.” - Joseph Goebbels Yeah. Facebook fucking sucks. Oh, the reason? Encourages danger and violence (which in their broad definition now includes quoting individuals who were associated to dangerous regimes). Welcome to the day and age in which another organiza…

FB's AI has no sense of humor. I got banned for 24 hours for this:

https://ibb.co/ysFwkCY

https://ibb.co/VjLZhPQ

Re: Facebook has exempted high-profile users from some or all of its rules

#350
post #340

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because of its network effect. Removing facebook, in a way is removing members of our connection circles.

Might be an unpopular opinion but if you have a connection that exists only via social media and not at least via phone calling or some other more personal forms of communication too, its not much of a real connection.

I wish I had time to text and call every one of my friends, but sadly I just don't. Facebook is perfect because I can post there and all my friends see it without me having to call or text every one of them the same story.

Then when we do get a chance to meet up, we can skip right to the discussion of the thing instead of me first having to tell the story.

Especially since some of my friends live very far away and have very busy jobs so we only see each other every few years, but this way I can still keep up on their lives and they on mine.

Post reply on HN