The funny thing is that if the DoD contracted out to build these, they would end up costing over $1 million each. There are a lot of unique opportunities for startups that are willing to use off the shelf technology and package it in unique ways. Provided, of course, you don't have any ethical qualms about selling technology that might be used for good or evil.
Hacker puts a video cam on an RC truck and saves the lives of 6 soldiers
31–40 of 101 posts
Re: Hacker puts a video cam on an RC truck and saves the lives of 6 soldiers
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let me be the first to say thank god they don't. We should all count our blessings that hackers tend to be peaceful people by nature. Imagine if we were trying to kill each other.
Well who do you think writes software that controls missiles?
Edit: Although I guess I can extend that to human societies in general, not just hackers.
Edit 2: Man, no idea who manages to disagree with that.
Re: Hacker puts a video cam on an RC truck and saves the lives of 6 soldiers
#33The guys at the toystore who are sending the RC trucks to the US soldiers - did they even stop for one second to ask "Why are those soldiers being attacked?" How did they come to the instant conclusion that the US soldiers are the good guys? How is this obvious?
Re: Hacker puts a video cam on an RC truck and saves the lives of 6 soldiers
#34The funny thing is that if the DoD contracted out to build these, they would end up costing over $1 million each. There are a lot of unique opportunities for startups that are willing to use off the shelf technology and package it in unique ways. Provided, of course, you don't have any ethical qualms about selling technology that might be used for good or evil.
1 guy w/ a rigged RC truck bears no liability. A defense contractor shipping these devices will have a team of lawyers chasing them around if it fails to find a bomb that kills someone.
I guess individual Americans are going to have to step up and fill the gap since contractors may not be willing, at low cost, to assume the liability.
I'd happily pay $500 plus the shipping to Afghanistan if it helps soldiers do their jobs faster and safer. I'm sure that I am not the only one.
Re: Hacker puts a video cam on an RC truck and saves the lives of 6 soldiers
#35The funny thing is that if the DoD contracted out to build these, they would end up costing over $1 million each. There are a lot of unique opportunities for startups that are willing to use off the shelf technology and package it in unique ways. Provided, of course, you don't have any ethical qualms about selling technology that might be used for good or evil.
Agree with the first part. However, I think that as long as you were fairly firm that you were only interested in building technology that saved lives (no RC toys with guns on them), I would not feel guilty in the slightest. After all, this truck can't really be used to hurt anyone, just save lives.
Re: Hacker puts a video cam on an RC truck and saves the lives of 6 soldiers
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
1 guy w/ a rigged RC truck bears no liability. A defense contractor shipping these devices will have a team of lawyers chasing them around if it fails to find a bomb that kills someone.
Great the legal environment we have created for ourselves prevents effective tools to be available to our troops. I guess individual Americans are going to have to step up and fill the gap since contractors may not be willing, at low cost, to assume the liability. I'd happily pay $500 plus the shipping to Afghanistan if it helps soldiers do their jobs faster and safer. I'm sure that I am not the only one.
Re: Hacker puts a video cam on an RC truck and saves the lives of 6 soldiers
#37The funny thing is that if the DoD contracted out to build these, they would end up costing over $1 million each. There are a lot of unique opportunities for startups that are willing to use off the shelf technology and package it in unique ways. Provided, of course, you don't have any ethical qualms about selling technology that might be used for good or evil.
They'd sell for a high price not necessarily due to price gouging, but because it costs a lot to sell to the military. The overhead of quality control, support, and all of the bureaucracy involved in dealing with a military customer would dwarf the actual per-unit cost.
Re: Hacker puts a video cam on an RC truck and saves the lives of 6 soldiers
#38The funny thing is that if the DoD contracted out to build these, they would end up costing over $1 million each. There are a lot of unique opportunities for startups that are willing to use off the shelf technology and package it in unique ways. Provided, of course, you don't have any ethical qualms about selling technology that might be used for good or evil.
Agree with the first part. However, I think that as long as you were fairly firm that you were only interested in building technology that saved lives (no RC toys with guns on them), I would not feel guilty in the slightest. After all, this truck can't really be used to hurt anyone, just save lives.
If the truck did not exist, 6 US soldiers would likely be dead. The insurgents would probably prefer this. Because the truck existed, the soldiers may now go on to fulfill their missions, which may result in insurgents being killed.
Basically, war is an ugly thing. Don't expect to get involved without getting a little dirty.
P.S. In the interest of transparency, I am an American and a strong supporter of the US military. I have family currently serving, and I'm glad that there was a device like the truck that saved lives.
Re: Hacker puts a video cam on an RC truck and saves the lives of 6 soldiers
#39The funny thing is that if the DoD contracted out to build these, they would end up costing over $1 million each. There are a lot of unique opportunities for startups that are willing to use off the shelf technology and package it in unique ways. Provided, of course, you don't have any ethical qualms about selling technology that might be used for good or evil.
They'd sell for a high price not necessarily due to price gouging, but because it costs a lot to sell to the military. The overhead of quality control, support, and all of the bureaucracy involved in dealing with a military customer would dwarf the actual per-unit cost.
// Dad used to work for place that made tents and bags for DOD