Live data from Hacker News

Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?

gravityandlevity.wordpress.com

11–20 of 234 posts

Re: Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?

#11
post #3

The simplest way I could ever wrap my head around this, is to understand that everything travels through spacetime at the same speed. There is no travelling faster or slower, just crossing the graph at a different angle.

Hm, but if I can make my angle orthogonal to the time axis, isn’t that like instantaneous movement?

It is instantaneous from the perspective of the object’s internal clocks.

Traveling at the speed of light results in infinite time dilation. Which means that from the perspective of an outside observer, no time at all is passing inside the spaceship.

Re: Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?

#13
post #3

The simplest way I could ever wrap my head around this, is to understand that everything travels through spacetime at the same speed. There is no travelling faster or slower, just crossing the graph at a different angle.

Hm, but if I can make my angle orthogonal to the time axis, isn’t that like instantaneous movement?

[deleted]

Re: Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?

#14
post #3

The simplest way I could ever wrap my head around this, is to understand that everything travels through spacetime at the same speed. There is no travelling faster or slower, just crossing the graph at a different angle.

What gets me about these classical ways of thinking about higher dimensions is collisions. Couldn't you bump into something going a different time rate and get deflected backwards if it was indeed analogous to classical movement?

Re: Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?

#15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hm, but if I can make my angle orthogonal to the time axis, isn’t that like instantaneous movement?

If you could move in space but not in time, then you would be in two places at the same time which would violate conservation of matter, right?

[deleted]

Re: Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?

#16

Wow, this is the first time I have understood why nothing can go faster than the speed of light and why time dilation is a thing. A very easy to read article, give it a try. Also if you are curious why a moving charge creates a magnetic field watch this Veritasium video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TKSfAkWWN0

[deleted]

Re: Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?

#17
post #3

The simplest way I could ever wrap my head around this, is to understand that everything travels through spacetime at the same speed. There is no travelling faster or slower, just crossing the graph at a different angle.

The thing that I really have trouble wrapping my head around is where each "thing" begins and ends, ex. for astronomically large bodies that take light years to travel across, how does it move and how does information propagate through it? I assume the simplest way to think of it is for every atom to have its own bar in the graph, and every "thing" is kind of "wiggly" as information travels through it.

But then that sounds like I'm describing the speed of sound, no? Maybe I'm confusing two concepts.

Re: Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?

#18
post #14
post #3

The simplest way I could ever wrap my head around this, is to understand that everything travels through spacetime at the same speed. There is no travelling faster or slower, just crossing the graph at a different angle.

What gets me about these classical ways of thinking about higher dimensions is collisions. Couldn't you bump into something going a different time rate and get deflected backwards if it was indeed analogous to classical movement?

Yeah, but if something goes at differrent time rate, it means it will have (typically very vastly) different space velocity. You can't have objects very near going at low space velocity and high time velocity, so this effect will not be noticeable.

Xkcd style explainer: When you have two things going at noticeably different time rates, you typically prepend "relativistic" [0] to all interactions. "Relativistic collision" sounds almost like "changes into huge amounts of plasma escaping from contact point".

[0] https://what-if.xkcd.com/1/

Re: Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?

#19
post #3

The simplest way I could ever wrap my head around this, is to understand that everything travels through spacetime at the same speed. There is no travelling faster or slower, just crossing the graph at a different angle.

You have to be careful when talking about 'speed' when you make time a dimension in your geometry. Traditionally, speed is a measure of how much of your space-time curve is in along the time axis.

For any space-time path, you can consider the coordinate system as an observer traveling that path would see it, in which that observer would see itself traveling through time at a rate of one second per second. Geometrically, if you were to draw where on the path the observer's clock ticks, the distance between ticks as measured along that path is constant regardless of the path.

The speed of light limit says something different. It limits what paths a physical observer can take.

Condsider a 1+1 dimensional universe (or our 3+1 universe with a test particle moving along a single spatial dimension).

Pick a non accelerating observer to construct the 'stationary' coordinate system. Plot spatial coordinates along the horizontal axis, and the time coordinate as the vertical axis. Pick units such that the speed of light is 1.

A particle moving at a constant velocity will follow a straight line. If the line is vertical the particle is stationary. If the line is at an angle, the speed of the particle is the inverse of the slope of the line. The speed of light limitation says that this line cannot be shallower than 45 degrees.

In more analytic terms, the distance metric for our 2 dimensional spacetime is given by ds^2 = dt^2 - dx^2. The speed of light limitation says that ds^2 cannot be negative for any path a particle actually takes.

In other words all particles must must have at least half of their travel be along the time dimension.

Post reply on HN