Live data from Hacker News

Work on interesting problems. Not interesting tech

ruky.me

91–97 of 97 posts

Re: Work on interesting problems. Not interesting tech

#91
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Build software for doctors' offices and medical groups! Please please please go into these areas with humility. Having worked for health tech companies in SF for a decade, I've seen so many people come from Google/Facebook/Mozilla/Ticketmaster/eBay to healthcare in order to "disrupt" and "fix" it. Their disruption or fixes are many times illegal, impractical, vaporware, or completely ignore industry standards and s…

Better bring a FAX machine..

This comment exemplifies my point.

Faxes are common in healthcare, and it's a common punch line from newcomers. But there's a series of standards that have been iterated on since the late 80s/early 90s that are finally getting to a place where they can eliminate faxes. There's standards for how to transmit data between EHRs, standards for how to store and represent data, and a standard API for 3rd parties to be able to write/read that data.

Regardless of these standards, you can already share data between hospitals using the same EHR -- so epic-to-epic (epic is the largest EHR vendor in the US) data sharing has been happening for a decade without any faxes. Unfortunately, there's a ton of different players in this game, so getting to a place where everyone has adopted the standards takes a long time, and the system still needs to keep running while this switch happens. To be clear, this is a common problem throughout tech: is it possible to run a native android app on iPhone? Do you think Google and Apple will ever make it possible to do that?

I can think of at least one medical company that builds their own technology and managed to paint themselves into a corner by not working from within the system. They just hire a bunch of engineers, who hear about how faxes run healthcare, so they say "cool, I can digitize the faxes" without bothering to consider or learn about other standards that are being developed. This leads to proprietary data models, with proprietary data representation, all transmitted using outdated technology. The engineers quit and go back to non-health tech, and tell their friends that health tech is so frustrating because it's so dated (make sure to bring your fax machine when you start your new job!).

But, really, the problem was never faxes. The problem is that healthcare is way more complicated, with way more stakeholders than consumer tech. You can't just launch a new product and iterate on the bugs later; people's lives are at stake, so the whole industry is heavily regulated. But if you enter with humility, recognizing that there is too much information for one person to know, but know that your skills are welcomed and needed. Take time to learn about things like HL7, FHIR, and clinical ontologies. And partner-- not just a quick knowledge sharing session-- actually partner with the domain experts, then there's a whole world of fascinating possibility out there.

Re: Work on interesting problems. Not interesting tech

#92
post #89
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> my salary history led me to be significantly underpaid for most of my career. I feel like this misses the point of the article. The author claims its important to enjoy what you're working on. They make no claims that doing so is a way to maximize your salary. I know tech gets paid well now but that wasn't always the case. Decades ago people went into medicine or law or finance if they wanted to optimize for pay an…

It's hard to enjoy what you are working on after you realize it's going from your fingers straight to the trash. And then you find yourself junior to someone who was getting 6 figures straight out of programming bootcamp three years ago. (And good luck trying to convince them that their genius idea has never actually worked.)

Those are both good, but I think distinct, points.

>It's hard to enjoy what you are working on after you realize it's going from your fingers straight to the trash.

I think this is more true of the two. Purposeful work is important to feeling fulfilled. Work that isn't appreciated isn't likely to leave one feeling like they have a purpose at work outside of generating a paycheck.

I think the other point is probably less wise. There will almost always be comparisons in which one falls short in terms of salary, even up to the billionaire class level. For me personally using that as a gauge is a recipe for constant unhappiness.

Re: Work on interesting problems. Not interesting tech

#94
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I heard some woman with a fake deep voice is on trial now.

I haven't been following that situation, I'm too focused on getting my insurance company to pay to sequence my poop.

> insurance company to pay to sequence my poop.

What's that about?

Re: Work on interesting problems. Not interesting tech

#95
post #54
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like she just needs to sign up for something like Square where your customers set an appointment, order services and pay and invoice. They can even be asked to pay before hand. Square is not the only player doing service appointment payments.

The reason that people don't do the "obvious" thing is rarely that they're ignorant or stupid. Best not to assume that you know all the relevant context.

Why do you assume this is the obvious thing? Maybe you shouldn't assume till you know all the relevant context?

I have a brick and mortar small business that takes appointments, have monthly recurring services and did not use Square appointments. We did everything manually to handle calendar appointments, invoice, charging for payments. Found out after a few months the time is not worth the savings and rather just get a service like Square. I thought maybe his client was the same and was trying to help.

But hey maybe Square was very obvious for your brick and mortar service based business and I'm one of the few "ignorant and stupid one".

Re: Work on interesting problems. Not interesting tech

#96
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I haven't been following that situation, I'm too focused on getting my insurance company to pay to sequence my poop.

> insurance company to pay to sequence my poop. What's that about?

uBiome— you’d send fecal samples to them and they’d sequence and tell you what bacteria you have. They claimed to have clinical value and started billing insurance, before eventually being raided and shut down for something along the lines of insurance fraud.

Re: Work on interesting problems. Not interesting tech

#97
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> insurance company to pay to sequence my poop. What's that about?

uBiome— you’d send fecal samples to them and they’d sequence and tell you what bacteria you have. They claimed to have clinical value and started billing insurance, before eventually being raided and shut down for something along the lines of insurance fraud.

Aha, such odd behavior by them
Post reply on HN