Live data from Hacker News

OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

whitehouse.gov

171–180 of 1001 posts

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#171
post #3

> OSHA will issue an Emergency Temporary > Standard (ETS) to implement this requirement Is this "temporary" in the same way that the PATRIOT act and our invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 were "temporary"? Well, I guess one should never let a good crisis go to waste...

> PATRIOT act Not sure if you're aware, but it expired in 2020

That is a bit of a moot point for a something that has been active for 2 decades.

To call 20 years 'temporary' is a big stretch.

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#172
post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A hard hat isn't a medical procedure. Some die from this vaccine. I weighed up the options and decided it was by far the lower risk option. I think people need to be free to make that choice. Freedom is so valuable.

VAERS shows several thousand have died. Some estimate 45k based on a Harvard study on VAERS indicating a % that goes unreported.

Please, cite your source.

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#173
post #85

I'm one shot in but think this is a huge government overreach to require this from businesses.

Not at all. Vaccine mandates date back to George Washington, if you look at it the right way.

I grew up overseas, and got poked on a regular.

Every time I traveled, we had to have "our shots."

These were 100% mandated by the country we were coming to. Since my "home base" was in Africa, we had some fun bugs, and I had to get a whole battery of shots.

I have several vaccination scars on my body, and I developed a lifelong fear of needles, as a result of the giant horse needles they used for the thick sludge they'd jab me with (which left me feeling like I'd lost a fistfight with a gorilla).

When I got my COVID vaccination shots, I didn't even feel it, as the needle was so tiny.

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#176

Is the federal government going to provide employers with the same legal immunity granted to pharmaceutical vendors via the PREP act? Does this mandate incorporate the Sept 2021 CDC definition of vaccine, https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/coronavirus/article25... > Before the change, the definition for “vaccination” read, “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”…

goal posts keep moving to fit the agenda of handing a select few billions of dollars at our expense.

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#177

Why must I be vaccinated if the vaccine doesn't prevent spread? Preventing spread to other people is the only plausible reason to force everyone to take it. I am comfortable catching the disease and even comfortable dying from it (the numbers are vastly on my side). I do far riskier things on a regular basis (extreme sports) and I do not understand the infantilization of society. Join the feedlot if you want but I wi…

> Why must I be vaccinated if the vaccine doesn't prevent spread? (...) I am comfortable catching the disease and even comfortable dying from it Became it's not about you , it's about everyone around you as a group. Those who are "comfortable catching the disease" are taking up a non-insignificant portion of available hospital beds, for instance, keeping health workers at their limit and preventing other people from…

>Became it's not about you, it's about everyone around you as a group. Those who are "comfortable catching the disease" are taking... Bla bla...

Then why are you smoking, or why are you eating fast food, why are you not exercising? These actions also put a burden on the health system. Why do covid and not tobacco? You know the answer already. This is not about anyone s health

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#178

Our largest healthcare provider has already mandated vaccines for their staff and insurance companies are now following suit because they got hammered with life insurance payouts for 2020 and first half of 2021. Waiting for retailers to announce this as well at some point.

Maybe slightly off topic, but it’s always been odd to me how life insurance tests with vigor for tobacco use but lack that enthusiasm for metabolic health / diet.

I believe Obamacare banned testing for everything except tobacco.

Edit: oh life insurance, thanks.

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not at all. Vaccine mandates date back to George Washington, if you look at it the right way.

Isn't this very different, though? Historically, mandated vaccines weren't mandated before we knew they were safe longer-term. We're still awaiting FDA approval for a majority of the available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the US, yet many folks would be mandated to receive one. Many folks will see this as being mandated to be a test subject, which is why there has been substantial legal pushback against the mandate less th…

[deleted]

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it alters the risk/benefit calculus. A sterilizing vaccine that stops transmission in its tracks, has a clear public health benefit to every part of society, even if there are risks. A non-sterilizing vaccine does not provide that society-wide public health benefit, leaving the employer to bear risks without benefit.

You are using the word 'sterilizing' to gain footing, though the difference in most peoples' meaning is negligible

What do you mean by "most peoples' meaning"? Do you mean most people don't understand the difference between a sterilizing and non-sterlizing vaccine?
Post reply on HN