Can't recommend the course enough and it's incredible that such a quality resource is available for essentially zero cost
https://github.com/fastai/course-nlp
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLtmWHNX-gukKocXQOkQju...
31–40 of 126 posts
Can't recommend the course enough and it's incredible that such a quality resource is available for essentially zero cost
https://github.com/fastai/course-nlp
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLtmWHNX-gukKocXQOkQju...
I have been thinking recently about the ethics of AI; At what point do we 'allow' AI to determine actions based on perceived (programmed) *BIAS* How can one prevent any bias on an AI's ability to be deterministic.
Can someone a successful (not necessarily profitable) concrete application of these things, other than "gpt-3 wrote an article in Guardian and said it wouldn't kill us".
Large language model are the rage, it seems. Can someone a successful (not necessarily profitable) concrete application of these things, other than "gpt-3 wrote an article in Guardian and said it wouldn't kill us".
What does democratize even mean?
What stops Google, Microsoft, etc from doing the same if Cohere's solution gains traction?
Oh, and the fact that Cohere is an expensive solution for a problem that's already been solved for free by open source groups.
The best part of the story for me is the work-life-balance he's able o achieve.
So it's censored. No thanks, not interested.
Large language model are the rage, it seems. Can someone a successful (not necessarily profitable) concrete application of these things, other than "gpt-3 wrote an article in Guardian and said it wouldn't kill us".
The article certainly paints them as the normal AI scam.
There are smaller tasks that need doing first rather than natural language.
Like OCR is still unsolved / not democratized as they call it.
But $$$$$ and VC capital != useful to people.
A good concrete application of what they are doing is the ability to DDOS information. They mass produce data to destroy current systems. Like SEO