Russia is a totalitarian dictatorship, why does Putin bother with silly tactics like this? A trick to try to lend an appearance of credibility to elections?
Three near-identical Boris Vishnevskys on St Petersburg election ballot
11–20 of 177 posts
Re: Three near-identical Boris Vishnevskys on St Petersburg election ballot
#12This is pretty similar to Ross Perot splitting the republican vote in the U.S. '92 election except that Perot and Bush should have been political allies and instead split the vote in favor of Clinton. I can't think of an example of using this against an opponent as described in the article could certainly be used here (though I suspect using duplicate names) would be harder to hide).
I'm sure you didn't intend this, but your comment is strongly reminiscent of this classic Russian political tactic for dealing with criticism from the west: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
Re: Three near-identical Boris Vishnevskys on St Petersburg election ballot
#13Russia is a totalitarian dictatorship, why does Putin bother with silly tactics like this? A trick to try to lend an appearance of credibility to elections?
Re: Three near-identical Boris Vishnevskys on St Petersburg election ballot
#14https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Distinguished_Gentleman
Talk about life imitating art and all that.
Re: Three near-identical Boris Vishnevskys on St Petersburg election ballot
#15Re: Three near-identical Boris Vishnevskys on St Petersburg election ballot
#16This reminds me of the 2019 Canadian federal election. There was a new party in that election led by a man named Maxime Bernier called the People's Party. They're a far-right populist party and generally awful. Bernier himself was running in Beauce, Quebec, which he had represented through the Conservative party since 2006 before he had created the People's Party. But then the Rhinoceros Party, a satirical political…
Note that even if the Rhinoceros votes went for the peoples party the same thing would have happened...
Re: Three near-identical Boris Vishnevskys on St Petersburg election ballot
#17This is pretty similar to Ross Perot splitting the republican vote in the U.S. '92 election except that Perot and Bush should have been political allies and instead split the vote in favor of Clinton. I can't think of an example of using this against an opponent as described in the article could certainly be used here (though I suspect using duplicate names) would be harder to hide).
Re: Three near-identical Boris Vishnevskys on St Petersburg election ballot
#18This reminds me of the 2019 Canadian federal election. There was a new party in that election led by a man named Maxime Bernier called the People's Party. They're a far-right populist party and generally awful. Bernier himself was running in Beauce, Quebec, which he had represented through the Conservative party since 2006 before he had created the People's Party. But then the Rhinoceros Party, a satirical political…
> This left the People's Party with no seats in parliament. Note that even if the Rhinoceros votes went for the peoples party the same thing would have happened...
Which is probably for the best. If this type of trickery had made a meaningful difference, the people fooled by the trick would have had some legitimate complaints. Moreover it would have really undermined the credibility of the winner, even if it wasn't their doing.
Re: Three near-identical Boris Vishnevskys on St Petersburg election ballot
#19Easy solution: Cattle ear tags for politicians.
Of course, I'm not sure how that'd work in Russia. I assume at least some of the criminal masterminds who fill the role of the West's owner class have a, like, inkan [0] or something.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seal_(East_Asia)#Japanese_usag...
Re: Three near-identical Boris Vishnevskys on St Petersburg election ballot
#20This is pretty similar to Ross Perot splitting the republican vote in the U.S. '92 election except that Perot and Bush should have been political allies and instead split the vote in favor of Clinton. I can't think of an example of using this against an opponent as described in the article could certainly be used here (though I suspect using duplicate names) would be harder to hide).
I'm sure you didn't intend this, but your comment is strongly reminiscent of this classic Russian political tactic for dealing with criticism from the west: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism