Live data from Hacker News

Today Sci-Hub is 10 years old. I'll publish 2M new articles to celebrate

twitter.com

161–170 of 171 posts

Re: Today Sci-Hub is 10 years old. I'll publish 2M new articles to celebrate

#161
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, it’s a new and better world. On the other side of the $275 per-paper Elsevier paywall, there are researchers who wish more people would read their papers. In my experience digging into robotics kinematics, authors are happy to answer questions and can point me to the right person when I want to send a check to support investigating specific research questions. The paywall deceives; science is neither an institut…

Most authors of scientific papers will gladly send you a free PDF of their papers if you ask them (assuming they remember to check their e-mail and respond in the first place). The profitability of their publisher is of no concern to them.

This is a solution that doesn't scale for authors or readers. You'll just end up building another sci-hub.

Re: Today Sci-Hub is 10 years old. I'll publish 2M new articles to celebrate

#162
post #5

I really hope sci-hub survives this. Sci-hub and libgen are like an entirely different internet, one allowing you to dive as deep as you wish into any technical subject. There’s really no comparison I have found anywhere for the depth of material available. People always point to Wikipedia, but all of that is surface level. If you to build something, research something, or just really delve into it, there’s no substi…

What about a Netflix but for science information . Pay $15 a month for access to a rolling catalogue of science info.

The research was already paid for by us. Make it free as it should be.

Re: Today Sci-Hub is 10 years old. I'll publish 2M new articles to celebrate

#163
post #5

I really hope sci-hub survives this. Sci-hub and libgen are like an entirely different internet, one allowing you to dive as deep as you wish into any technical subject. There’s really no comparison I have found anywhere for the depth of material available. People always point to Wikipedia, but all of that is surface level. If you to build something, research something, or just really delve into it, there’s no substi…

It's the typical Eastern European (or non-US centric) Internet. The IP laws make sense only if people have the capital to buy stuff. When I was a kid in a post-Soviet country, no one ever bought anything original (like a CD with a game). Everything was bootleg or pirated from the Internet. After [the US lobby started to push for copyright enforcement in the EU under the threat of sanctions]( https://falkvinge.net/201…

> that were paid for by the taxpayers

What do taxpayers have to do with it? I thought it was just a for-profit company?

Re: Today Sci-Hub is 10 years old. I'll publish 2M new articles to celebrate

#164
post #44
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there any legal risk to users in North America that do this? Is this copyrighted material?

I encourage you to do this in the most audacious, and visible way possible. Let see how will they sue millions, upon millions of people. Make them face a fait accompli. They already lost.

They only need to create some examples.

Re: Today Sci-Hub is 10 years old. I'll publish 2M new articles to celebrate

#165
post #44
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there any legal risk to users in North America that do this? Is this copyrighted material?

I encourage you to do this in the most audacious, and visible way possible. Let see how will they sue millions, upon millions of people. Make them face a fait accompli. They already lost.

Please look into the history of file sharing and how that went for individuals.

These companies will pick examples and ruin their lives. It's hard to say how big the risk is here but this is reckless advice.

Vote for copyright reform.

Re: Today Sci-Hub is 10 years old. I'll publish 2M new articles to celebrate

#166
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Copyright holders taking down these libraries should be considered a crime against humanity.

Sciencide or knowledgecide. Let's hope our descendants condemn companies and personalities behind these attacks like we condemn criminals of the past.

We should start with Mickey Mouse.

Re: Today Sci-Hub is 10 years old. I'll publish 2M new articles to celebrate

#167

I just noticed something funny: The library of Alexandria was accidentally burned in 48 BC by Julius Ceasar. Here we are in 2021, we now have Alexandra's library, which rivals the first in size and scope, and there are at least as many forces trying to burn it. But fortunately this one is digital and you too can have a copy in your hallway closet for the price of some harddrives and bandwidth. Go make a backup, if yo…

I personally see it as an essential element of preserving democracy going forward. As science becomes a more influential component in public policy (it has arguably become the most influential component over the past 18 months), you end up with a governance style of “the law is whatever science says it should be”. If that science is not available for public scrutiny, then you have the added dynamic of “…and the scien…

> “the law is whatever science says it should be”

First we'd need to solve the friction between how stable we want our laws and the progress of science over time.

We've seen in the past two years that going back and forth with recommendations makes the general public just give up.

Re: Today Sci-Hub is 10 years old. I'll publish 2M new articles to celebrate

#170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the typical Eastern European (or non-US centric) Internet. The IP laws make sense only if people have the capital to buy stuff. When I was a kid in a post-Soviet country, no one ever bought anything original (like a CD with a game). Everything was bootleg or pirated from the Internet. After [the US lobby started to push for copyright enforcement in the EU under the threat of sanctions]( https://falkvinge.net/201…

> that were paid for by the taxpayers What do taxpayers have to do with it? I thought it was just a for-profit company?

The content i.e. research papers they publish are mostly from government funded research. Taxpayers fund those but don't get access: we have to buy the results from these for-profit corporations.
Post reply on HN