I really should have saved the draft of its output
I have exhausted my 18$ credits for this article alone
I have tried multiple times to fine tune the parameters
I agree this seemed misleading But I have edited to less than 10%
GPT-3 is getting better, this is written by it. I did edit and added few points
21–25 of 25 posts
Re: GPT-3 is getting better, this is written by it. I did edit and added few points
#22It should be noted that GPT-3's training dataset is limited up to October 2019, so there's no way the term "NFT" would appear in the input dataset let alone be correlated with crypto. OpenAI has never announced an update to the core model since it was released in mid-2020 either.
Re: GPT-3 is getting better, this is written by it. I did edit and added few points
#23It should be noted that GPT-3's training dataset is limited up to October 2019, so there's no way the term "NFT" would appear in the input dataset let alone be correlated with crypto. OpenAI has never announced an update to the core model since it was released in mid-2020 either.
I remember NFT way before 2019, WP says that it was coined in 2017, and GPT-3 appears to have no issue explaining what NFTs are:
"*Non-fungible tokens are* tokens that are unique. Each token is unique in some way. For example, each token may represent a piece of land, or an individual baseball card.
Fungible Tokens
Fungible tokens are tokens that are interchangeable. Each token is interchangeable with another token.
The most common example of a fungible token is a cryptocurrency. This is because each unit of a cryptocurrency, for example, bitcoin, has the same value as every other unit. Fungible tokens are useful in situations where you want to represent something that is interchangeable. For example, you may want to represent the ownership of a supply"...
Re: GPT-3 is getting better, this is written by it. I did edit and added few points
#24It should be noted that GPT-3's training dataset is limited up to October 2019, so there's no way the term "NFT" would appear in the input dataset let alone be correlated with crypto. OpenAI has never announced an update to the core model since it was released in mid-2020 either.
I remember NFT way before 2019, WP says that it was coined in 2017, and GPT-3 appears to have no issue explaining what NFTs are: "*Non-fungible tokens are* tokens that are unique. Each token is unique in some way. For example, each token may represent a piece of land, or an individual baseball card. Fungible Tokens Fungible tokens are tokens that are interchangeable. Each token is interchangeable with another token.…
Hmm, that's surprising. (although that sample does imply the OP is especially heavily edited as in itself it's slightly contradictory)
Although I suspect passing "NFT" vs. "Non-fungible token" as the prompt will get different results.
Re: GPT-3 is getting better, this is written by it. I did edit and added few points
#25> I edited and added few points that’s it I want to see a diff to properly judge how good GPT-3 is. Also, it's a generative model - what was the input to get to this article?
+1, I want to see the input, and all edits made. Also, there is no evidence that this was actually generated by GPT-3. It sounds weird, but people have faked weirder stuff and disseminated it on Hacker News to get some sort of virality / credibility.
Also how many times they tried the same input but rejected the result before finding one they liked.