My mother does this, and additionally used to do arithmetic this way.
She never really taught us how to do math this way.
11–20 of 160 posts
My mother does this, and additionally used to do arithmetic this way.
She never really taught us how to do math this way.
The correct way is to count in binary, and easily reach 1023 without needing a third hand [0]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_binary
The correct way is to count in binary, and easily reach 1023 without needing a third hand [0]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_binary
The correct way is to count in binary, and easily reach 1023 without needing a third hand [0]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_binary
Given that most people cannot move their ring finger independently of their middle finger, this seems like a stretch.
https://www.businessinsider.com/order-a-beer-like-a-german-2...
I like what I got to know as "the Japanese way" to count to 144 on my fingers. I´m sure it´s not exclusive to Japan tho. Using thumb as a pointer, I count not on the fingers, but their segments. Each finger is 3 segments, which gives 12 per hand. Now, to boost it, one hand is used to count the dozens from the other hand. Gets me thinking, maybe this is one of the reasons for popularity of 12-based systems in ancient…
The popularity of 12-based systems is due to the fact that 12 is divisible by 2, 3, and 4.
This can be fatal - as shown in Tarantino's Inglourious Basterds...
Still, I'm never able to memorise it, no matter how many times I learn it.
I like what I got to know as "the Japanese way" to count to 144 on my fingers. I´m sure it´s not exclusive to Japan tho. Using thumb as a pointer, I count not on the fingers, but their segments. Each finger is 3 segments, which gives 12 per hand. Now, to boost it, one hand is used to count the dozens from the other hand. Gets me thinking, maybe this is one of the reasons for popularity of 12-based systems in ancient…
> maybe this is one of the reasons for popularity of 12-based systems in ancient times? The popularity of 12-based systems is due to the fact that 12 is divisible by 2, 3, and 4.
The correct way is to count in binary, and easily reach 1023 without needing a third hand [0]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_binary
> and easily reach 1023 without needing a third hand Given that most people cannot move their ring finger independently of their middle finger, this seems like a stretch.