Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy (2008) [pdf] • Hacker News Board

Re: Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy (2008) [pdf]

#31

Post by MyLegacyKit » Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 6:08 AM UTC

Isn't that one of many plagiarized papers by someone who made cosplaying the dead and the alive (Dave Kleiman, David Rees, Deborah Kobza, Satoshi Nakamoto, Tim May, to name a few), lying and creating forgeries a fulltime job? Who's latest con is a massive neverending Nigerian prince advance fee scam on Calvin Ayre, now ending in a totally corrupt and bankrupt Bitcoin affinity fraud that is failing by all serious metrics? The man who is called a liar and a fraud by 7 judges on 3 continents, who is now involved in numerous lawsuits in which his counsel ONTIER has no shame to reuse Faketoshi lies and forgeries that have been called out by ATO and court Florida already?

What a shame there are still people who give this con man the benefit of the doubt. He doesn't deserve it:

https://link.medium.com/rj9V8yb0pib

Re: Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy (2008) [pdf]

#32

Post by oudekaas » Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 6:40 AM UTC

nullc wrote: post #27

oudekaas wrote: post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

reading this is like a bad novel dude, you are trying so hard to discredit Craig it is now becoming a tad sad tbh….. Craig has been inviting people in court (including BTC devs) and is awaiting the COPA case to prove he is Satoshi, it was Peter McKormack who bailed out even though being backed by Tether (you know that endless source of money he could use to fight Craig) It was cobra whi backed out of defending the bi…

> please notice how he is to much of a coward to fight him in court I filed my response to the conman's laughable $6 billion dollar lawsuit against me on June 16th, which is now almost 11 weeks ago. By comparison, I was only granted only 4 weeks to both find legal representation and respond. Wright appears to be doing almost everything in his power to delay progress in court cases. E.g. he's started claiming that cov…

Stating he is delaying the courts, to make a point, is a little weak imo, courts get delayed all the time, Craig was actually trying to expedite the case not that long ago.

Rather odd for someone to pull everyone in court and fight his legacy and then postpone the cases right, he must be off of his hat to even invite you into court if he has zero chance of winning it....

After all if he can’t prove he is Satoshi the courtcase would be an act of hari kiri....

So basically your argument is, he is delaying the courts so therefor he is a fraud?

I am counterattacking your claims and I am using my oudekaas pseudonym for it, and yes I opened a new account here, nothing to do with sockpuppets or starting conversations with myself to press a certain narrative right?

Peter McKormack no longer fights the fact that Craig is not Satoshi which was originally one of his defenses, in fact despite Tether’s infinite resources, Peter McKormack is now only defending the defamation, so you are lying and misinforming people here....

It’s pretty damn obvious why McKormack dropped that defense.... they know they can’t win it.

You don’t have to do anything right? except you do EVERYTHING

Re: Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy (2008) [pdf]

#33

Post by SRTP » Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 7:13 AM UTC

Craig Wright is a liar and a fraud.

Re: Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy (2008) [pdf]

#34

Post by SRTP » Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 7:16 AM UTC

jourfa wrote: post #24

So many paid shills (probably just a couple of #greg accounts) are trying to attack the creator of Bitcoin.

Must be rough, putting your faith in a scammer pretending to be Satoshi, then seeing your investment disappear like snow before the sun.

BSV was a top 10 coin a few months ago. Right now? Ranked 50. Must be rough.

Re: Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy (2008) [pdf]

#35

Post by nullc » Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 7:54 AM UTC

oudekaas wrote: post #32

nullc wrote: post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> please notice how he is to much of a coward to fight him in court I filed my response to the conman's laughable $6 billion dollar lawsuit against me on June 16th, which is now almost 11 weeks ago. By comparison, I was only granted only 4 weeks to both find legal representation and respond. Wright appears to be doing almost everything in his power to delay progress in court cases. E.g. he's started claiming that cov…

Stating he is delaying the courts, to make a point, is a little weak imo, courts get delayed all the time, Craig was actually trying to expedite the case not that long ago. Rather odd for someone to pull everyone in court and fight his legacy and then postpone the cases right, he must be off of his hat to even invite you into court if he has zero chance of winning it.... After all if he can’t prove he is Satoshi the…

> After all if he can’t prove he is Satoshi the courtcase would be an act of hari kiri....

Actually, in his lawsuit against me Wright's attornies write: "Whether or not Dr Wright is, in fact, Satoshi Nakamoto, is not an issue that is likely to fall for determination in the Claim."

But even ignoring that, Wright is engaging the courts because he's backed into a corner. He convinced a former drug smuggler and indicted money launderer to loan him enormous sums of money in trade for fictitious Bitcoins which he's now unable to pay up. Every lie Wright has told so far ties his hands and forces his moves, he's using the lawsuits as an excuse to not hand over the coins he's promised his victims, coins he can't hand over because they were never his and/or never existed.

Whatever negative consequences he suffers from filing wave after wave of spurious lawsuit doesn't hold a candle to what will likely happen to him when the scheme finally collapses. His only hope is to drag it out for as long as he can.

Re: Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy (2008) [pdf]

#36

Post by oudekaas » Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 12:06 PM UTC

nullc wrote: post #35

oudekaas wrote: post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Stating he is delaying the courts, to make a point, is a little weak imo, courts get delayed all the time, Craig was actually trying to expedite the case not that long ago. Rather odd for someone to pull everyone in court and fight his legacy and then postpone the cases right, he must be off of his hat to even invite you into court if he has zero chance of winning it.... After all if he can’t prove he is Satoshi the…

> After all if he can’t prove he is Satoshi the courtcase would be an act of hari kiri.... Actually, in his lawsuit against me Wright's attornies write: "Whether or not Dr Wright is, in fact, Satoshi Nakamoto, is not an issue that is likely to fall for determination in the Claim." But even ignoring that, Wright is engaging the courts because he's backed into a corner. He convinced a former drug smuggler and indicted…

nice story mate, I guess Craig investing millions into TAAL, putting in countless hours of work into explaining Bitcoin script in his Bitcoin theory series is all part of the con right? All keeping up appearances, before the grand finalé. May I remind you, Craig wanted this to end in court… as mentioned b4 Craig would have to be absolutely batshit insane to do this….. Possible, but extremely unlikely.

funfact, it is you that is displaying questionable obsessive behaviour towards Craig, there is no way an intelligent guy like you would spent so much effort into discrediting someone that supposedly is a non event at the same time Besides that the Bitcoin you support clearly is an experiment gone wrong, it may be around for a bit, but competing with shackles on. It is here where it becomes so obvious that BSV = Bitcoin even if you don’t believe Craig which is not required to understand that BSV is clearly Bitcoin as it was designed with set in stone rules. Game theorie wise, it is hilarious to see that BTCers crave decentralization yet, don’t grasp the easy concept of playing by a fixed rulebook. One of the main reasons to have flexible rules is for certain players to gain an advantage by changing the rules in there favour. Alas Blockstream has done exactly that, forcing Segwit down peoples throats in order to create a separate network that relies on Blockstream…

Well done Greg and friends, I applaud your success, but now I like to see the truth come out.

The fact that cryptofights is popular and working on BSV not on ETH, now doing 2 million tx a day, isn’t at all an indication of how far ahead BSV is versus the rest of the socalled “crypto” casino space, right?

BTC sits on 7 tx per sec with a broken lightning network…… BSV reached 100K transactions a sec with terra node.

BTC relies solely on price and high fees from centrally planned blocksize to survive the block reward halving, BSV already has natural demand from apps that already highlight, small blocks are a dead end given enough time

Even if Craig is not Satoshi, (he is) what will you do if BSV keeps growing and growing, will you admit you were wrong?

Re: Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy (2008) [pdf]

#37

Post by oudekaas » Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 12:24 PM UTC

MyLegacyKit wrote: post #31

Isn't that one of many plagiarized papers by someone who made cosplaying the dead and the alive (Dave Kleiman, David Rees, Deborah Kobza, Satoshi Nakamoto, Tim May, to name a few), lying and creating forgeries a fulltime job? Who's latest con is a massive neverending Nigerian prince advance fee scam on Calvin Ayre, now ending in a totally corrupt and bankrupt Bitcoin affinity fraud that is failing by all serious metr…

Arthur von Pelt, another obsessed anti Craig personality….

Arthur wakes up and goes to bed thinking about Craig…..

It’s almost like Arthur is giving Craig the benefit of the doubt

Not that long ago, Arthur was put in place by Renowned Cryptographer Iain Grigg when Arthur asked the question if Craig ever actually stated anything about Bitcoin that wasn’t already known.

Iain then had to educate Arthur about how Craig indeed explained things about Bitcoin that even Iain didn’t know at the time.

Things like the double hash for instance, funnily enough after Craig explained the double hash it was subsequently altered in the BTC wiki.

Yes ladies and gentleman this is the kind of folks we are dealing with here….

Re: Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy (2008) [pdf]

#38

Post by myoffices » Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 5:54 PM UTC

nullc wrote: post #12

dzdt wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And the Dave Kleiman who is second author on this paper is that Dave Kleiman, the one who most likely invented bitcoin. Wright has claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto but has proven himself to be a liar on this topic; by his actions he clearly believes that Kleiman controlled the Satoshi bitcoin fortune before his untimely death.

Dave Kleiman had absolutely nothing to do with the creation of Bitcoin. Prior to his death Kleiman was IT support staff for a small county sheriff's department in Florida. He has no relevant expertise -- e.g. the only evidence of Kleiman ever writing any program ever was a simple visual basic script to automate checking the windows registry for forensic information. Literally the only thing remotely suggesting any co…

The Satoshi Nakamoto emails were compromised in 2013 & available on the dark web & that was when the Faketoshi saga took form. Too bad these are the elements we all have to deal with years later.

Bitcoin was formed in C then translated to C++. Too bad for Crack that he has only began to realize that Satoshi Nakamoto is a group with wide reach and several people.

Re: Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy (2008) [pdf]

#39

Post by myoffices » Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 6:02 PM UTC

oudekaas wrote: post #36

nullc wrote: post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> After all if he can’t prove he is Satoshi the courtcase would be an act of hari kiri.... Actually, in his lawsuit against me Wright's attornies write: "Whether or not Dr Wright is, in fact, Satoshi Nakamoto, is not an issue that is likely to fall for determination in the Claim." But even ignoring that, Wright is engaging the courts because he's backed into a corner. He convinced a former drug smuggler and indicted…

nice story mate, I guess Craig investing millions into TAAL, putting in countless hours of work into explaining Bitcoin script in his Bitcoin theory series is all part of the con right? All keeping up appearances, before the grand finalé. May I remind you, Craig wanted this to end in court… as mentioned b4 Craig would have to be absolutely batshit insane to do this….. Possible, but extremely unlikely. funfact, it is…

Craig aka Crack Right is a serial liar- If you want to kill that movement it is simple- provide real evidence.

Subpoena the list from google - en.bitcoin.it/wiki/x A known Satoshi Nakamoto Post from 2002 the posters signed in again in 2018 in front of the supporters. His minions are ill informed & offer a wild story filled with misfacts. Others point out factual data that they continue to deny.

https://twitter.com/TeamSatoshi/status/1432429656217726977/p... for the actual posting 20 years later.

The tactic is to show a promising new feature they coerced to be on the new platform and ignore the facts included as data.

Re: Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy (2008) [pdf]

#40

Post by keymone » Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 7:42 PM UTC

oudekaas wrote: post #36

nullc wrote: post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> After all if he can’t prove he is Satoshi the courtcase would be an act of hari kiri.... Actually, in his lawsuit against me Wright's attornies write: "Whether or not Dr Wright is, in fact, Satoshi Nakamoto, is not an issue that is likely to fall for determination in the Claim." But even ignoring that, Wright is engaging the courts because he's backed into a corner. He convinced a former drug smuggler and indicted…

nice story mate, I guess Craig investing millions into TAAL, putting in countless hours of work into explaining Bitcoin script in his Bitcoin theory series is all part of the con right? All keeping up appearances, before the grand finalé. May I remind you, Craig wanted this to end in court… as mentioned b4 Craig would have to be absolutely batshit insane to do this….. Possible, but extremely unlikely. funfact, it is…

> explaining Bitcoin script in his Bitcoin theory series

i watched a lot of this, gotta say it's pretty good cringe-entertainment, mostly comprised of self-aggrandizing statements and explorations of trivial comp-sci topics.

these videos used to be even more entertaining when ryan x charles was asking for details and specifics in response to craig's vague hand-waving, but recent videos no longer have ryan. wonder why.

> before the grand finalé

grand finale will be craig pleading for insanity/illness that makes him pathological liar. he already started laying ground by claiming to be autistic.

> BSV reached 100K transactions a sec with terra node

i can reach million tps on my laptop, everybody knows this number in isolation is meaningless.