Live data from Hacker News

Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African warehouse

news.samsung.com

11–20 of 727 posts

Re: Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African warehouse

#11

This technology was used for good this time, but there's nothing stopping it from being used for evil next time. The fact that Samsung is even capable of doing this means you don't have control over your Samsung TV even if you do own it legally.

At least they’re not scanning your media library against a list of hashes yet. Edit: Ahh, I see from the replies I have had my fill of curiosity for the day.

[deleted]

Re: Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African warehouse

#12

This technology was used for good this time, but there's nothing stopping it from being used for evil next time. The fact that Samsung is even capable of doing this means you don't have control over your Samsung TV even if you do own it legally.

At least they’re not scanning your media library against a list of hashes yet. Edit: Ahh, I see from the replies I have had my fill of curiosity for the day.

They are, they're just doing it for advertising, not piracy prevention.

https://www.samsung.com/us/business/samsungads/resources/tv-...

Re: Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African warehouse

#13

I am quite ambivalent to this feature. On one hand, if someone steals your TV, you can deactivate it. But now there is also a benefit to having a dumb TV. Imagine if you have too old of a model, so Samsung decides to remotely disable your TV.

I suspect you can not block your TV, if someone steals it. This is bad idea and a slippery slope towards various versions of nonsense.

Re: Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African warehouse

#15
What are the chances that someone would phish an admin user to the platform that blocks all the TV systems and block the all samsung TV devices. What are the chances that they could be snooping and monitoring what I am watching.

It would be nice to see some more transparency in these remote monitoring and management systems. The system setup is very similar to Teamviewer or kaseya where you accept them to manage your device when you accept the terms of service or user agreement.

I am not sure if it is just me, but It is making a little paranoid. In my opinion, this is not a good thing.

Re: Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African warehouse

#16
Unless Samsung enforces an internet connection on the first start of the TV it's completely useless as long as they don't connect it.

Still, a worrisome approach. After a few years if they shut down or change the blocking servers will the TV still work or it will become a brick since it can't check its authenticity?

Re: Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African warehouse

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At least they’re not scanning your media library against a list of hashes yet. Edit: Ahh, I see from the replies I have had my fill of curiosity for the day.

They are, they're just doing it for advertising, not piracy prevention. https://www.samsung.com/us/business/samsungads/resources/tv-...

That's why you never connect any smart TV to your network and instead use a standalone device combined with a PiHole.

Re: Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African warehouse

#18

This technology was used for good this time, but there's nothing stopping it from being used for evil next time. The fact that Samsung is even capable of doing this means you don't have control over your Samsung TV even if you do own it legally.

Wait till your TV license expires

Re: Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African warehouse

#19
"Should a customer’s TV be incorrectly blocked, the functionality can be reinstated once proof of purchase and a valid TV license is shared to serv.manager@samsung.com or click here for more information"

Fuck off.

This is a wake up call for us to make free and open source Smart TV operating system so we can stop this tyranny.

Post reply on HN