Earlier quoted context omitted.
The home page does happen to have everything necessary: it has a basic examples, a few blurbs, and a "use cases" explanation: > Janet makes a good system scripting language, or a language to embed in other programs. Think Lua or Guile. Janet also can be used for rapid prototyping, dynamic systems, and other domains where dynamic languages shine. I could see the sections reordered, but it's hard to really fault this h…
I disagree. 'Think Lua' is not an good explanation. I mean if I want Lua, I use Lua.
Do you have reading comprehension issues that you mistake examples for explanations and are blind to the actual explanations surrounding the examples?
> I mean if I want Lua, I use Lua.
That I know about Lua doesn't mean I want Lua. Hell, that I wanted lua in the past doesn't mean I'm closed to replacing it with something else. Given how well-known Lua is in the space, "think lua" is a rather good example.