Live data from Hacker News

The Facebook Phone

ft.com

1–10 of 23 posts

Re: The Facebook Phone

#3
“We hope to sell millions . . . Anything below millions will be disappointing.”

I think they will be disappointed. I can't name a smart phone where it takes more than about 2 keystrokes to do anything you want on Facebook.

Re: The Facebook Phone

#5
post #2

Vodafones product page for it: http://www.vodafone.com/content/index/about/what/devices/vod...

Seems like a pretty half-assed product. "Vodafone 555 Blue", really, that's what you're gonna call it?

Anyone remember the Motorola ROKR? Yeah, exactly...

Re: The Facebook Phone

#6
post #2

Vodafones product page for it: http://www.vodafone.com/content/index/about/what/devices/vod...

Seems like a pretty half-assed product. "Vodafone 555 Blue", really, that's what you're gonna call it? Anyone remember the Motorola ROKR? Yeah, exactly...

RAZR, ROKR, RIZR, KRZR, PEBL, SLVR

shudders

Re: The Facebook Phone

#9
Imagine a phone built purely for Facebook, which is built to their specs (low battery usage) and uses half the bandwidth of current smartphones when it comes to updating FB status, uploading pictures etc. Facebook could have a winner in a country like India, where bandwidth still sucks and there is a large FB user population.

A cheap subsidized phone, and maybe even with subsidized bandwidth usage (similar to Amazon Kindle and Sprint) built just for Facebook would be a killer. They could certainly grow their user population beyond a Billion, but the question is whether they could monetize on those users.

Re: The Facebook Phone

#10
It was clear they eventually team up with a phone company when they revealed the new messaging system in November of last year. This is a big step to further establish their platform.

That said I would have expected a device with a bigger display and less buttons. This looks like a business phone to manage your spare time.

I hope this is just a mockup of the homescreen as it features icons that look nearly the same (three icons that could mean "contacts" and two that could be for "messages"). Also browsing the web might not be a great experience.

I think they could have lowered the price tag and make browsing on Facebook free focusing more on ad revenue.

Post reply on HN