Show HN: I built an AI art installation at home generating new pieces on the fly
61–70 of 161 posts
Re: Show HN: I built an AI art installation at home generating new pieces on the fly
#62Re: Show HN: I built an AI art installation at home generating new pieces on the fly
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
He just needs a higher resolution screen, a screen that is much bigger, and placed inside of very nice frame. With the cables hidden. Then it's ready for the gallery. Especially if you could come up with a way to filter out some of the images that look too much like how a random broken monitor will output. This image in particular feels like "real" art to me. https://imgur.com/gaJVSs3
it's okay as it is -- IF, and only IF, the artist says so ! Rauschenberg too, as well as Lichtenstein and many others, wouldn't have liked it a bit being turned into some hotair egomaniac 0-creative wraped in plastic in some fin-groupies Schnabel'oesque or Koons'ian gallery spot
Re: Show HN: I built an AI art installation at home generating new pieces on the fly
#64I just finished my latest project, building an AI art installation at home, generating 100 % unique artworks on the fly. Just push the button below the screen and another one will be displayed. When the button has been pushed, the old artwork is deleted and can't be retrieved again. Setup: * An Nvidia Jetson Xavier NX was used for all logic, machine learning inference, art kiosk GUI etc. * A StyleGAN was used to gene…
Curious -- since you're only doing the inference/generation on the frame, and since you're not doing it all the time, did you need a Jetson or would an RPI have sufficed? Did you test inference speeds across different edge compute options?
Re: Show HN: I built an AI art installation at home generating new pieces on the fly
#65Art shouldn't be unlimited. Its ok to call things screensavers, because screensavers are also cool, its just that it isnt art in the sense of "art" the word, if an AI is doing it, its something else, and making it unlimited is not interesting, it is irresponsible. Its the constraints that make art what it is, not simply the definition of an infinite possibility space
Re: Show HN: I built an AI art installation at home generating new pieces on the fly
#66Art shouldn't be unlimited. Its ok to call things screensavers, because screensavers are also cool, its just that it isnt art in the sense of "art" the word, if an AI is doing it, its something else, and making it unlimited is not interesting, it is irresponsible. Its the constraints that make art what it is, not simply the definition of an infinite possibility space
Re: Show HN: I built an AI art installation at home generating new pieces on the fly
#67Personally believe that art requires intention and some attempt at communication but it's an interesting project.
Who's to say that the AI doesn't have intent, and makes no attempt at communication? These are certainly very philosophical questions and I would be ready to stand by the idea that first, there is possibly intent and communication here, and second, I've never heard of this narrow definition of art before. Art is art, defining it so narrowly seems strange to me.
Personally I don't think a machine generating pixels from neural networks trained on intentional art can create art - it can create something that seems very similar because it seems to generate the same or similar output but its missing the process and intention of art. If an artist draws random shapes with no intention or intent to communicate or evoke thought/emotion, all they're doing is making shapes, unless the random shapes themselves are an intent to communicate something (which is difficult if they're actually random).
'art is art' is a tautology with no meaning, and defining art in a way that makes some things not art is the only way you can have a useful definition of art.
Change my tire? Art. Spill chocolate milk on the table? art. vomit after drinking too much? art. because art is art, right?
I guess the question is why you think everything, including things done without intention or intent to communicate, is art?
Re: Show HN: I built an AI art installation at home generating new pieces on the fly
#68Personally believe that art requires intention and some attempt at communication but it's an interesting project.
I think the generated pixels are not the art. The whole piece is the art, made by the artist, i.e. the OP.