Time to retire the CSV?
11–20 of 594 posts
Re: Time to retire the CSV?
#12It's probably not news to anyone who works with data that CSVs are inferior to other file formats like parquet. I think the valuable insight here is that there needs to be a meme / movement that CSV is bad or deprecated. That's what's actually going to put the nails in its coffin, not private griping from developers when they get CSVs. I'm all for it. Down with CSV :)
And the cycle continues.
Re: Time to retire the CSV?
#13Re: Time to retire the CSV?
#14Re: Time to retire the CSV?
#15Re: Time to retire the CSV?
#16Re: Time to retire the CSV?
#17"In favour of what?", that is the matter. CSV is a format more for humans and less for machines, but that is the use case: a format that is good enough to be compiled by humans and read by machines. At the moment there aren't many alternatives.
Until someone gets excel to ingest and produce something in a better format, we're pretty much stuck.
Re: Time to retire the CSV?
#18As long as it's replacement opens in Numbers and Excel.
Re: Time to retire the CSV?
#191. You can read them without any software
2. Streamable row by row
3. Compress well
To be honest most of the points in this article could be addressed by standardizing a method of defining a schema for the CSVs. It could even be backward compatible by appending the definition as metadata on the header column or as a separate file.
One thing that would be good to have is a standardized method of indexing CSVs so that random access is possible too, though that would be more involved.