Live data from Hacker News

Yimby housing bills are wildly unpopular in the state (CA), a new poll shows

48hills.org

31–32 of 32 posts

Re: Yimby housing bills are wildly unpopular in the state (CA), a new poll shows

#31

For society to function properly and for human beings to be free, there are some things that must be treated as so fundamental that they aren't subject to a vote. We protect the right to speech, for example, not because everything everybody says is popular. We protect it because it isn't! Housing is like this. Basically nobody wants a bunch of new housing in their neighborhood. But society can't function if people ar…

I liked your comment. I feel the concept we need to completely destroy is that real estate is a store of wealth.

We should try for the opposite, to make housing as affordable as possible (via the free market).

The main ways to do this are abolish:

zoning,

minimum parking restrictions,

minimum unit size,

Eliminate free street parking,

Eliminate mortgage interest tax deduction and anything else designed to favor ownership over renting.

Then, after we do that:

- start building large rotating space habitats, so we can start building effectively infinite living space, and fit a trillion humans in our local area of the solar system.

Re: Yimby housing bills are wildly unpopular in the state (CA), a new poll shows

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's some truth to this, but it doesn't paint the full picture. In high-demand areas it's the land that's valuable, not the structures on the land. If Palo Alto, say, were upzoned prices wouldn't fall. Developers would love to buy that land and develop it. That's not to say that literally every single neighborhood would benefit from upzoning, but the areas most in need of upzoning do have this property. Yet homeow…

>> People genuinely do not want more density in their neighborhoods How is that not NIMBYism ?

It is NIMBYism. I'm describing NIMBYism.
Post reply on HN