Live data from Hacker News

Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

slate.com

161–170 of 233 posts

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Remove inefficient governments, privatise all public services, let the market clean up the mess and attract foreign capital through zero taxation and lack of regulations. You need rich foreign expats, tired of paying 50% of their salaries in exchange for run down cities and homelessness, creating value in the country. If tourism is your only strategy you won't go far.

> privatise all public services, let the market clean up the mess Half-Croat here. What you propose would destroy what is left of the country. Public services are already shoddy as it is because Croatia doesn't have much economy outside of tourism, agriculture and a bit of heavy industry. The best and young minds have been leaving the country for well over half a century.

I really love Croatia, it's a beautiful country, but I don't want to deal with the Croatian government.

If conditions were more fiscally favourable, if there were better private schools, an english speaking expat community, I'd definitely move there.

I think Montenegro is doing pretty good in that regard. Taxation is straightforward and reasonable. That attracted private capital. Good private schools started popping out, the Tivat marina was built. It's also the first country to be in line to join the EU - which is not something I consider positive, but it's certainly a sign of the quality of the country.

Sadly Croatia is still not there and, frankly, I doubt it's going to get there anytime soon. Croatia is like a poorer version of countries in the EU: high and complex taxes, which get converted into mediocre services after passing through an inefficient government. The only difference is that European countries are richer and therefore the services are marginally better, even if they're getting worse and worse over time.

I understand my anarchist solution can be seen as radical and it's not going to happen, but even moving in that direction would be helpful.

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#162
post #107
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it bizarre? Sounds like similar rules to anywhere - no country wants to let in people who can't support themselves.

Not being an employee (for a while or forever) doesn't mean not being able to support yourself. Yes, super-rich enjoy this freedom (of movement and living where they please), but there are lots of people who are rich/sustainable enough to contribute positively to any economy but current immigration systems doesn't allow this in most countries.

No categorisation system is perfect, so there will always be cases that fall through the cracks, but most countries try to offer a spread of visas that cover most of the kinds of positive contributions to the country that they want to attract, without permitting too many who will be a drain instead. Work visas are by no means the only option, but if you're arguing that you're going to contribute positively to the economy then you need to be able to demonstrate that.

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#163
post #149
post #147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Her professor counceled her to let him trap others in the same situation?!? Fine professor. Sounds like she should wait until after she gets her phd, then scream. And, while leveling accusations at the professor too. He's as guilty as they are.

You should council your friend to keep as much data, write everything down (keep a log book), keep backups of emails etc. Don't let time, let scum win.

Not all want to fight the just fight. By fighting you become the victim twice.

Yes, you may save others but I cant blame someone for makinf the pragmatic choice for their lives and family.

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#164
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Falklands is much closer to Argentina though - they should belong to Argentina by right of proximity.

Do you have any more info on this right of proximity? It’s nearer to me so it’s mine is that about it?

Would that work recursively?

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand doubt, you don't know me. But I'm not sure what you want? She's now an officer in my son's startup.

It sounds like an awful experience. Was this recent or 30 years ago?

Three or four years ago.

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#166
post #149
post #147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Her professor counceled her to let him trap others in the same situation?!? Fine professor. Sounds like she should wait until after she gets her phd, then scream. And, while leveling accusations at the professor too. He's as guilty as they are.

You should council your friend to keep as much data, write everything down (keep a log book), keep backups of emails etc. Don't let time, let scum win.

I did, but as a tall white middle-class male counseling a short young inner-city woman of color it's a little difficult without being patronizing. Her response was "This is not even the worst thing that's been done to me; I have to let some of it go."

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's no great conspiracy here. The vast majority of people in Taiwan do not want to be a part of the PRC. The vast majority of people in the Falklands want to remain a British Overseas Territory.

It doesn't matter. You can kidnap a daughter from a poor family and now she doesn't want to to back. Yes, we should respect her decision, but it does not make kidnapping right. It is the result of the colonial age.

The "kidnapping" in your example happened in 1949. It's no longer about the hypothetical daughter, but more likely her grandchildren. Given the passage of time it's farcical to insist on reversing this.

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US is actually bizarre, anyone born in the US automatically gets US nationality. This leads to amusing birth tourism. Iirc it is the only country that does this.

It's not unique to the US at all. Almost all the countries in North and South America are like this. If you want to claim it's wrong that's another debate but everyone in the Americas came from somewhere else, borders are an ephemeral concept and what's bizarre to me is how strict Europe is with jus sanguinis when its borders have changed so many times in the last century and in the centuries leading up to it. I do b…

Modern states are to a large part insurance providers. Citizens pay premiums and get health care, pensions, disability care etc.

Insurance works when a large group of people pay premiums to protect against some condition that has not happened yet. If you could sign up for a fire insurance once your house is burning, the system would collapse.

For similar reasons, modern states need to keep poor people out since, on average, they will be a large net burden on their welfare systems.

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Giving up Hong Kong isn't necessarily the "right thing" - Hong Kong Island was ceded to the UK in perpetuity ages ago, in the 1840s. Kowloon and the New Territories were on a 99 year lease expiring in 1997. The UK giving up Hong Kong Island is as "right" as America ceding California to the Spaniards in the late 1990s IMO. Both defeats occurred around the same time. The people of Hong Kong were as much Chinese IMO as…

> The people of Hong Kong were as much Chinese IMO as the Californians are Spanish. This is plainly wrong. The population distribution of Cantonese speakers shows that Hong Kong is only a small part of the Cantonese speaking region. [1] And although the situation apparently has changed, at 1997, 40 percent of Hong Kong people identified themselves as "Hong Konger and Chinese", together with the 20 percent identifying…

Majority of people in California can speak Spanish, and California is geographically part of a larger Spanish speaking area.

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Giving up Hong Kong isn't necessarily the "right thing" - Hong Kong Island was ceded to the UK in perpetuity ages ago, in the 1840s. Kowloon and the New Territories were on a 99 year lease expiring in 1997. The UK giving up Hong Kong Island is as "right" as America ceding California to the Spaniards in the late 1990s IMO. Both defeats occurred around the same time. The people of Hong Kong were as much Chinese IMO as…

> The people of Hong Kong were as much Chinese IMO as the Californians are Spanish. This is plainly wrong. The population distribution of Cantonese speakers shows that Hong Kong is only a small part of the Cantonese speaking region. [1] And although the situation apparently has changed, at 1997, 40 percent of Hong Kong people identified themselves as "Hong Konger and Chinese", together with the 20 percent identifying…

By your logic, Germany should be annexing Austria and parts of Switzerland.
Post reply on HN