Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Tara 2.0 – Fast Jira alternative with automation based on Git events

tara.ai

11–20 of 97 posts

Re: Show HN: Tara 2.0 – Fast Jira alternative with automation based on Git events

#11
post #5

Why startups don't try to break this charge per user per month thing? Would be great to have products which would charge like $10 a month for up to 5 users or so... why so greedy and charge 10 per user? So, if small team of 5..10 people, at $8 a month per user, is like $100 a month for single service. And if startup needs like 5..10 different services to pay, it becomes like a pretty good amount for paying for differ…

Hi ddon, one of the founders here. I personally do agree on flipping the pricing models to be more inclusive. We’ve tried our best to make them as cost effective as possible and even go as far as allowing unlimited users on a free plan.

When we were working on pricing, we looked into everything from compute costs per user, data storage per workspace, new feature development, marketing costs and much more over the span of time. We came up with our pricing based off those costs and hence on our lower plans we’re still under the price of similar tools.

We’d love to, in the future figure out more flexible ways to price our users but at the same time maintain the service and growing feature set. I can assure you that we definitely gave having a Spotify family plan like pricing model a thought. In the mean time we are working with startups to accommodate their needs as they move into paid plans by offering discounts on long term commitments, we’re always open to discussions with our users and helping them stay empowered on our platform.

Re: Show HN: Tara 2.0 – Fast Jira alternative with automation based on Git events

#12
post #5

Why startups don't try to break this charge per user per month thing? Would be great to have products which would charge like $10 a month for up to 5 users or so... why so greedy and charge 10 per user? So, if small team of 5..10 people, at $8 a month per user, is like $100 a month for single service. And if startup needs like 5..10 different services to pay, it becomes like a pretty good amount for paying for differ…

Because per user pricing is in line with the value you are receiving as a customer. If you are not receiving $XXX dollars per month in value, why use the service at all?

You are trading money for time and efficiency, after all.

Re: Show HN: Tara 2.0 – Fast Jira alternative with automation based on Git events

#13
post #5

Why startups don't try to break this charge per user per month thing? Would be great to have products which would charge like $10 a month for up to 5 users or so... why so greedy and charge 10 per user? So, if small team of 5..10 people, at $8 a month per user, is like $100 a month for single service. And if startup needs like 5..10 different services to pay, it becomes like a pretty good amount for paying for differ…

If you're actually employing 5 people then $100 is nothing for service which is central to your work. If it's 5 people not making money, then maybe you don't need a proprietary service.

Re: Show HN: Tara 2.0 – Fast Jira alternative with automation based on Git events

#14
Can I self-host it?

The only reason we're going to move away from JIRA is that Atlassian dropped server installs and is moving everyone to their cloud or datacenter products.

Have a great conversion from JIRA and a reasonably-priced self-hosted option, we'll be looking at you in six months.

Re: Show HN: Tara 2.0 – Fast Jira alternative with automation based on Git events

#17
post #10
post #9

I love the pun on the front page. Will definitely be keeping an eye on this.

Here's a few that didn't make the cut: The Dev files - the source code is out there Dancing with the git stars. (I could go on).

Please do!

Re: Show HN: Tara 2.0 – Fast Jira alternative with automation based on Git events

#18
post #13
post #5

Why startups don't try to break this charge per user per month thing? Would be great to have products which would charge like $10 a month for up to 5 users or so... why so greedy and charge 10 per user? So, if small team of 5..10 people, at $8 a month per user, is like $100 a month for single service. And if startup needs like 5..10 different services to pay, it becomes like a pretty good amount for paying for differ…

If you're actually employing 5 people then $100 is nothing for service which is central to your work. If it's 5 people not making money, then maybe you don't need a proprietary service.

This is the correct answer.

Re: Show HN: Tara 2.0 – Fast Jira alternative with automation based on Git events

#19
post #14

Can I self-host it? The only reason we're going to move away from JIRA is that Atlassian dropped server installs and is moving everyone to their cloud or datacenter products. Have a great conversion from JIRA and a reasonably-priced self-hosted option, we'll be looking at you in six months.

Its definitely something we've been exploring when putting our product roadmap together. I'm curious though, if we had a private cloud instance vs self hosted? I'd love to understand why self hosted would be the option you'd go for.

Re: Show HN: Tara 2.0 – Fast Jira alternative with automation based on Git events

#20
post #5

Why startups don't try to break this charge per user per month thing? Would be great to have products which would charge like $10 a month for up to 5 users or so... why so greedy and charge 10 per user? So, if small team of 5..10 people, at $8 a month per user, is like $100 a month for single service. And if startup needs like 5..10 different services to pay, it becomes like a pretty good amount for paying for differ…

Ironically enough, self-hosted Jira used to do this, until they got rid of the server licenses and forced everyone onto their cloud, and now they charge per user.
Post reply on HN