Live data from Hacker News

The Federal Writers’ Project fueled the cultural ferment of the New Deal era

jacobinmag.com

21–29 of 29 posts

Re: The Federal Writers’ Project fueled the cultural ferment of the New Deal era

#21

With so many unfilled positions - in restaurants, retail, construction, etc. - is yet another government program really the answer? There's plenty of opportunity in the free market to be had. This reads like an ode to a more romantic time, as misguided as even that might be.

Program? No. Law(s), maybe.

Basic minimum: prorated benefits. Pick a cutoff point for full time (say 20 hours) and every hour for a worker under that is pro-rated at their fraction out of "FULLTIME" hours a week for the pay period.

Taxes == Benefits: Government does PTO, medical, etc; make everything EASIER FOR BUSINESSES, no more worrying about these things other than over the tops they aren't required to provide. Make those easy too for Paid time off and any other multiplicate benefit a flat multiplier if they want N% the standard rate.

The biggest sticking point for some workers revolves around time. Be that work-life balance (partly fixed by some the above), unpredictable hours, or hours that no one wants. It needs to be easier for the workers to have a __viable career__ as a whatever, not just be a cog in a machine that is summoned like a slave at the business' behest.

Work/Life balance might include kids or anything else outside of work that's important. Where it doesn't really matter there's an obvious answer. Where it does, like public service, maybe they need workers with careers covering that slot; who expect to regularly work that shift on a predictable schedule.

There should also be a formally allowed process for schedules. If it's specified in the primary worker contract as a fixed base schedule that's one thing. If it isn't then the employee should be able to decline, as a contractor that refuses the offered hours, with no other detriment (obviously non-take home pay, but no other penalty).

Re: The Federal Writers’ Project fueled the cultural ferment of the New Deal era

#22
No, it effectively sapped the cultural foment of the era. Instead of stirring up revolt, writers were employed by the government. And they were employed to make people all feel more connected, in that government's name. As if it were all a giant advertisement for the power of government in people's lives, restoring people's faith in the government.

It's all part of how FDR saved capitalism through strident nationalism. Did it work because or in spite of cutting the capitalists out of the solution?

Re: The Federal Writers’ Project fueled the cultural ferment of the New Deal era

#23
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You'd rather a promising writer serve dishes than write? Would you say that about someone who could code?

How about both? I’m not being glib but it’s not like you can’t have a blue collar job and write during your downtime. Especially if it is your passion. You’re far more likely to hire a bunch of “writers” who don’t want to do work they consider beneath them than to give the next Hemingway who is stuck at McDonald’s their big chance.

You never once worked a blue collar job, did you?

Re: The Federal Writers’ Project fueled the cultural ferment of the New Deal era

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How about both? I’m not being glib but it’s not like you can’t have a blue collar job and write during your downtime. Especially if it is your passion. You’re far more likely to hire a bunch of “writers” who don’t want to do work they consider beneath them than to give the next Hemingway who is stuck at McDonald’s their big chance.

Hard to write if you're working 80 hours a week at a restaurant. Yes, that is a realistic amount of time for someone at a restaurant to work before you say "just work part time and survive on $200 a week".

Lots of prolific writers composed their early works while working menial jobs. It's hardly a barrier to entry for people with something worthwhile to contribute and if anything it's become easier to publish and find an audience rather than harder.

Re: The Federal Writers’ Project fueled the cultural ferment of the New Deal era

#25
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How did it destroy revenue streams exactly? I’ve just never understood that to be the case. (Disclosure, I worked with and attended university on the dime of the folks who built Amazon’s POD acquisition - so I have some fealty (and insight), I suppose)

I've used POD, and within limits, its amazing (the fussyness about KDP print-ready markup is a royal pain, but I blame the PDF standards bodies for that, not to mention the iSBN scam business worldwide. anyhoo) Imagine you have 100 troubadours, touring the kings domains worldwide, for a free food in return for a song, of which only Blondel makes a mint. Then imagine you allow anyone who can play the penny whistle to…

I suppose destroying revenue streams is a way of phrasing the “issue,” but at the end of the day we’re just further democratizing content.

If consumers don’t want $REAL_AUTHOR and so she loses money, that’s her failing to adapt to the market. I don't feel that gatekeepers creating artificial scarcity is a good thing.

Re: The Federal Writers’ Project fueled the cultural ferment of the New Deal era

#26
post #9

With so many unfilled positions - in restaurants, retail, construction, etc. - is yet another government program really the answer? There's plenty of opportunity in the free market to be had. This reads like an ode to a more romantic time, as misguided as even that might be.

You'd rather a promising writer serve dishes than write? Would you say that about someone who could code?

If there is demand for their product they won't have to worry about having to enrolling in such government programs. The same goes for anyone in any discipline.

Re: The Federal Writers’ Project fueled the cultural ferment of the New Deal era

#27

Low-value post on my part but I'm pretty sure that's supposed to be foment, not ferment.

No it’s ferment. It can also be used to describe something that’s intensely active or roiling. Sort of like how juice or malt starts to bubble and foam as yeast works on it.

Heh, there's some overlap between the terms but foment is likely the right one. For others curious:

> When change is a brewin', remember: to ferment is to cause a chemical change to food or drink, like turning grapes into wine, but to foment is to stir up trouble, like turning a group of people into an angry mob. [1]

[1] vocabulary.com/articles/chooseyourwords/ferment-foment/

Re: The Federal Writers’ Project fueled the cultural ferment of the New Deal era

#28
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've used POD, and within limits, its amazing (the fussyness about KDP print-ready markup is a royal pain, but I blame the PDF standards bodies for that, not to mention the iSBN scam business worldwide. anyhoo) Imagine you have 100 troubadours, touring the kings domains worldwide, for a free food in return for a song, of which only Blondel makes a mint. Then imagine you allow anyone who can play the penny whistle to…

I suppose destroying revenue streams is a way of phrasing the “issue,” but at the end of the day we’re just further democratizing content. If consumers don’t want $REAL_AUTHOR and so she loses money, that’s her failing to adapt to the market. I don't feel that gatekeepers creating artificial scarcity is a good thing.

Absent literacy programs and market growth in non English speaking economies, we're fully literate and read as much as we want. So making 100x supply side choice isn't actually "good" except to reduce income per author because in the end I only have 24h per day to read in. I can't read more. There's a disequilibrium here. Sure, choice. But the net effect is Amazon got richer and most authors and publishers lost out.

Re: The Federal Writers’ Project fueled the cultural ferment of the New Deal era

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it’s ferment. It can also be used to describe something that’s intensely active or roiling. Sort of like how juice or malt starts to bubble and foam as yeast works on it.

Heh, there's some overlap between the terms but foment is likely the right one. For others curious: > When change is a brewin', remember: to ferment is to cause a chemical change to food or drink, like turning grapes into wine, but to foment is to stir up trouble, like turning a group of people into an angry mob. [1] [1] vocabulary.com/articles/chooseyourwords/ferment-foment/

Nah it's definitely ferment. "Cultural ferment" is a pretty well established stock phrase going back forever. https://lmgtfy.app/#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=%22cultural%20ferment%22
Post reply on HN