Earlier quoted context omitted.
>I was under the impression that comps have the practice of giving work to people that might produce good results with that kind of work, and trust me, people who might produce good results will want the freedom WFH makes possible. Just because companies were only giving WFH opportunity to high performers doesn't mean all high performers prefer WFH opportunities. Have you considered the possibility that some people a…
>Even for the best employee who do the most amazing kind of work, being in person and take advantage of politics and "ass kissing" would only help, not hurt. I find this statement so out of reality. Because often what happens is that this "best employee" gets side tracked by someone who is not actually productive, but just good at playing politics. So our hypothetical "best employee" will have to play politics in add…
There is so much to measure how much an engineer contributes other than how many lines they churn out or how many PRs they merge. Things like training, mentorship, organizational level influences are critical to a company’s success.
In fact, companies values a lot of those soft impact so much more than raw productivity.