Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks
sciencedirect.com
Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks
1–10 of 135 posts
Re: Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks
#2A biological neuron is 6e17 Daltons[0], so on the order of quadrillions of atoms. A single synapse is a huge landscape studded with receptors of various kinds, and the whole thing is swimming in salt solution where chemicals diffuse stochastically. And then there's the glia.
This is why I dismiss any claims about the computational power of the human brain, most of which seem to begin with the assumption that "1 spike = 1 FLOP", and that'll all that goes on in the brain.
[0]: https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/facts.html and https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1E-06+grams+in+dalton
Re: Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks
#3Said models still don't seem to be very close to being able to predict the behaviour of biological neurons though.
If they did, then we'd have invented artificial human-level intelligence.
Re: Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks
#4Re: Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks
#5ANN neurons are Pitts-McCulloch neurons, an extremely stylized model of the 1940's understanding of neurons. Each neuron represents a dot product plus a function application. A biological neuron is 6e17 Daltons[0], so on the order of quadrillions of atoms. A single synapse is a huge landscape studded with receptors of various kinds, and the whole thing is swimming in salt solution where chemicals diffuse stochastical…
Re: Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks
#6ANN neurons are Pitts-McCulloch neurons, an extremely stylized model of the 1940's understanding of neurons. Each neuron represents a dot product plus a function application. A biological neuron is 6e17 Daltons[0], so on the order of quadrillions of atoms. A single synapse is a huge landscape studded with receptors of various kinds, and the whole thing is swimming in salt solution where chemicals diffuse stochastical…
Transistors, while dramatically simpler than neurons, also have fairly complicated physics. It's quite hard to determine the computational power of a microprocessor when you only know roughly how transistors work and have no idea how microprocessors work.
So I tend to err on the side of biology being more complex than not.
But it's absolutely possible that the high-level behaviour is simple while the underlying implementation is complex and chaotic, as in the gas laws.
Re: Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks
#75-8 layers but how many weights per layer? I can’t access the article but it says it’s a deep CNN so probably in the order of a few thousands weights per layer.
Re: Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks
#8ANN neurons are Pitts-McCulloch neurons, an extremely stylized model of the 1940's understanding of neurons. Each neuron represents a dot product plus a function application. A biological neuron is 6e17 Daltons[0], so on the order of quadrillions of atoms. A single synapse is a huge landscape studded with receptors of various kinds, and the whole thing is swimming in salt solution where chemicals diffuse stochastical…
(part of the quadrillion atoms system of course)
Re: Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks
#9This is trying to train a neural network to match the behaviour of various mathematical models of biological neurons. Said models still don't seem to be very close to being able to predict the behaviour of biological neurons though. If they did, then we'd have invented artificial human-level intelligence.
Re: Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks
#10This is trying to train a neural network to match the behaviour of various mathematical models of biological neurons. Said models still don't seem to be very close to being able to predict the behaviour of biological neurons though. If they did, then we'd have invented artificial human-level intelligence.
Surrogate models are a thing though, and it's going to be an interesting time as we gradually figure out what approximations and optimizations are 'acceptable', and what computations really are necessary for "intelligence" (whatever that might be).