Live data from Hacker News

Open-source Dropbox client, with multi-account, no-device-limit and M1 support

github.com

81–90 of 204 posts

Re: Open-source Dropbox client, with multi-account, no-device-limit and M1 support

#82
post #77

Would be cool to get around a limitation of Dropbox's native client: filenames with emojis (and other utf8 I assume) won't upload. If their filesystem doesn't like utf8, maybe the client could convert the offending filenames to base64 or punycode, and convert filenames back from the cloud... maybe I can find a place in the code to try this out, thanks for open sourcing. I notice you're using type hints in python and…

what kind of psychopath puts emojis in filenames??

screenshots of a browser where your screenshots are automatically named by the application window you're taking a screenshot of. if that tab is an article or forum post or anything that has an emoji in its title, you're getting emojis in the filename. you only find out when you go to find the screenshot later and it's missing. fun stuff

Re: Open-source Dropbox client, with multi-account, no-device-limit and M1 support

#83

I joined Dropbox in around 2010 and used it religiously through University to ensure all my work was being backed up as I worked on assignments. I used it for group projects and it was fantastic, at the time it was the most reliable cloud storage and I tried Microsoft Live Mesh, Live drive etc and found they were unreliable in syncing changes to edited files. Dropbox was flawless. I then shifted into using it to also…

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe Google Photos stores pictures in original size anymore.

It's a setting, so you can pick. It used to be from back when Google photos offered unlimited storage for compressed photos (that they don't offer anymore Iirc).

Re: Open-source Dropbox client, with multi-account, no-device-limit and M1 support

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

imagine using Dropbox with those storage requirements...

The "imagine $X" construct has colloquially grown to mean "$X is irrational", which is strange to me here - the lack of binary diffing means if you change a single bit of your video editing project, the whole thing gets synced to the cloud. Dropbox is a common solution for small business VCS that's not VCS, I've seen it used for born exactly that way a half dozen times the past decade.

> the lack of binary diffing means if you change a single bit of your video editing project, the whole thing gets synced to the cloud

I know someone using Dropbox for video editing, they've been using the Synology Dropbox client which also uses the API. It hasn't been a problem.

The large video files (tens or hundreds of GB) are ingested once and never edited, the only edits to files are the small project files (megabytes), and some graphics files (hundreds of megabytes). Re-exports of rendered video causes the whole file to change anyway due to the nature of video compression so binary diff doesn't help there anyway.

Re: Open-source Dropbox client, with multi-account, no-device-limit and M1 support

#86
post #7

I was a very early Dropbox adopter but eventually switched to OneDrive a few years back because they bundled Office 365 with 1 TB of storage. I just went and looked at the official Dropbox plans to see if there was a family plan similar to the 5 users I get with Office 365/OneDrive...and found their plan/pricing page overwhelming. There's rows upon rows of features to compare across versions like "Traffic and Insight…

Similar experience here: the paid options are way too expensive for private use, when none of the new features has any value to you.

Seems to me that the correct strategy for Dropbox would have been to be super focused on the core product and on not hiring in too many people/taking in too much capital. That would of course have introduced a market cap, but if 1% of everyone had ended up on a reasonably priced personal plan it would have been a roomy cap.

As it was, Dropbox has grown into yet-another ms-office-in-the-sky and there is no way they will make it against their competitors who can burn the cash, and who are slowly catching up on sync technology.

This is really a shame too: Dropbox is just the gold standard for sync. Before Dropbox I was using unison[0] and tried every other sync product, but nothing came close. TBH I am still using Dropbox every day, getting around the device limit by sharing stuff with multiple free accounts...

[0]: https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/

Re: Open-source Dropbox client, with multi-account, no-device-limit and M1 support

#87
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In my impression, they are removing useful features and adding unnecessary ones. Since I joined over a decade ago, they have removed an extremely useful Public folder with the capability to generate direct links, limited the number of devices, and added a ton of features I never wanted from them, like Paper.

Yeah agree, public folders were great. I’m still a user of dropbox since early days but: - I’m stupid and I kept a git repo in there, it became corrupt. Doesn’t surprise me but wondering what else is fragile in dropbox. - Uploading pictures on mobile is really really slow. For some reason google photos on iOS is so much faster, like incomparably faster. - Google photos also allows you to quickly get to all your pictu…

The speed of Google photos is actually breathtaking. The fact that you can instantly lag free scroll through tens of thousands of images and it all just loads instantly is quite impressive imo.

The problem with some of the competitors is they do not treat photos as its own thing separate from files. I think google did a great job understanding that photos are not just a folder of files but that they require their own dedicated software.

Re: Open-source Dropbox client, with multi-account, no-device-limit and M1 support

#88
post #7

I was a very early Dropbox adopter but eventually switched to OneDrive a few years back because they bundled Office 365 with 1 TB of storage. I just went and looked at the official Dropbox plans to see if there was a family plan similar to the 5 users I get with Office 365/OneDrive...and found their plan/pricing page overwhelming. There's rows upon rows of features to compare across versions like "Traffic and Insight…

Does anyone understand how OneDrive and Dropbox can be so cheap compared to S3?

- 2 TB on Dropbox is £7.99 / month

- 1 TB OneDrive is £59.99 / year

- 1 TB on S3 is $23.99 / month

How can Dropbox and OneDrive be cheaper than S3 at all, let alone after providing value add on top? Is it something to do with lower reliability and availability guarantees? Is it possible to buy direct access to their underlying storage?

https://www.dropbox.com/individual

https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/microsoft-365/onedrive/compa...

https://aws.amazon.com/s3/pricing/

Re: Open-source Dropbox client, with multi-account, no-device-limit and M1 support

#90
post #69

I am extremely happy that my institution has it's own cloud storage and uses ownCloud. I have never had to deal with Dropbox, OneDrive or gDrive bullshit.

I'm fairly happy of the OwnCloud/NextCloud alternative, but they're not very well-engineered products (although they got better over the last years). Definitely much better than Dropbox on Linux though, which is clearly a third-class citizen for the Dropbox company. The NC client (and I assume also OC) can still generate conflicts even on a single machine, when the network/server connection is not stable. I also reme…

Nextcloud works decent for normal file stuff but doesn't really have a solution for photos. You can turn on the auto photo sync for a folder but after a few thousand files it gets unusably slow.
Post reply on HN