Live data from Hacker News

The 'Great Resignation' is really the 'Great Discontent'

gallup.com

1–10 of 264 posts

Re: The 'Great Resignation' is really the 'Great Discontent'

#2
i find myself quite sympathetic to this perspective.

to revitalize, some serious change is needed, that opens a wide number of people a sense of agency & possibility & opportunity. with the titanization of industry, there's less & less compelling ways to employ oneself, & re-enabling upstarts & small scale competitors (who are not simply bought out & plucked up as soon as they show promise).

it is the difference between vitality & perpetual decay (an upward, out-of-reaching, effervscing decay), as i see it.

Re: The 'Great Resignation' is really the 'Great Discontent'

#3
> To engage workers, managers must fulfill the 12 essential elements of engagement

Hm. There are few jobs that can become life goals, most are boring. And with a years long pandemic and uncertain future, to work or not to work? Work for what purpose? No level of engaging is enough if people can see through the ruse. If anything i d expect more people to go solo

Re: The 'Great Resignation' is really the 'Great Discontent'

#5

> To engage workers, managers must fulfill the 12 essential elements of engagement Hm. There are few jobs that can become life goals, most are boring. And with a years long pandemic and uncertain future, to work or not to work? Work for what purpose? No level of engaging is enough if people can see through the ruse. If anything i d expect more people to go solo

> There are few jobs that can become life goals, most are boring.

That's because the big tech megacorps raised the bar in order to attract the best workers available so they could grow to have the "eliteness" that you see today. The problem is, there are only so many Apples or Netflixes with this kind of strategy so everything else looks boring in comparison.

Re: The 'Great Resignation' is really the 'Great Discontent'

#6
> $9,000 a year to keep each disengaged worker and between $25,000 and $100,000 to replace them.

Given how job tenure has plummeted over the years, I have a hard time believing this is accurate. Does anyone know a place where retention efforts come anywhere close to hiring efforts?

Re: The 'Great Resignation' is really the 'Great Discontent'

#7

> To engage workers, managers must fulfill the 12 essential elements of engagement Hm. There are few jobs that can become life goals, most are boring. And with a years long pandemic and uncertain future, to work or not to work? Work for what purpose? No level of engaging is enough if people can see through the ruse. If anything i d expect more people to go solo

That quote sounds so formulaic I can almost hear the cash registers ringing up the fees for the consultants hired to implement them. Surely this new corporate initiative, which we sent senior management to workshop about at a golf resort in Hawaii (the same week the team was doing 18-hour days to ship the product for the customer deadline), will bring happiness and good things to our essential human resources.

Re: The 'Great Resignation' is really the 'Great Discontent'

#9

> $9,000 a year to keep each disengaged worker and between $25,000 and $100,000 to replace them. Given how job tenure has plummeted over the years, I have a hard time believing this is accurate. Does anyone know a place where retention efforts come anywhere close to hiring efforts?

> I have a hard time believing this is accurate

How does that follow? It certainly seems that spending $9K/year or less compared to coughing up 3 to 10 times that to hire proves that attention to retention is nowhere near that given to hiring.

Post reply on HN